IRIS
ABRAMO, GIOVANNI
 Distribuzione geografica
Salva come PNG Salva come JPEG
Continente #
NA - Nord America 20.559
AS - Asia 3.550
EU - Europa 2.928
Continente sconosciuto - Info sul continente non disponibili 545
SA - Sud America 460
AF - Africa 59
OC - Oceania 27
Totale 28.128
Salva come PNG Salva come JPEG
Nazione #
US - Stati Uniti d'America 20.447
SG - Singapore 1.916
DE - Germania 876
CN - Cina 567
RU - Federazione Russa 440
IT - Italia 396
BR - Brasile 363
HK - Hong Kong 287
VN - Vietnam 273
IE - Irlanda 264
GB - Regno Unito 236
UA - Ucraina 223
SE - Svezia 166
BD - Bangladesh 132
FR - Francia 100
JP - Giappone 98
FI - Finlandia 70
IN - India 59
CA - Canada 55
KR - Corea 50
AR - Argentina 34
NL - Olanda 32
AT - Austria 31
AU - Australia 23
ZA - Sudafrica 22
ES - Italia 20
MY - Malesia 19
IQ - Iraq 18
MX - Messico 18
PL - Polonia 18
EC - Ecuador 15
PK - Pakistan 15
TR - Turchia 15
ID - Indonesia 14
CO - Colombia 13
SA - Arabia Saudita 12
TW - Taiwan 12
CL - Cile 11
UZ - Uzbekistan 11
JM - Giamaica 10
RO - Romania 10
IR - Iran 9
VE - Venezuela 9
PE - Perù 8
AE - Emirati Arabi Uniti 7
EG - Egitto 7
JO - Giordania 7
KE - Kenya 6
BE - Belgio 5
CH - Svizzera 5
PH - Filippine 5
PT - Portogallo 5
PY - Paraguay 5
ET - Etiopia 4
MA - Marocco 4
NI - Nicaragua 4
NZ - Nuova Zelanda 4
PS - Palestinian Territory 4
TH - Thailandia 4
AZ - Azerbaigian 3
CR - Costa Rica 3
GE - Georgia 3
GR - Grecia 3
HR - Croazia 3
HU - Ungheria 3
LV - Lettonia 3
MD - Moldavia 3
NO - Norvegia 3
OM - Oman 3
PA - Panama 3
SI - Slovenia 3
TT - Trinidad e Tobago 3
AL - Albania 2
BA - Bosnia-Erzegovina 2
BB - Barbados 2
DO - Repubblica Dominicana 2
GT - Guatemala 2
HN - Honduras 2
KZ - Kazakistan 2
NG - Nigeria 2
NP - Nepal 2
PR - Porto Rico 2
SN - Senegal 2
SV - El Salvador 2
TN - Tunisia 2
TZ - Tanzania 2
UY - Uruguay 2
ZM - Zambia 2
AM - Armenia 1
AO - Angola 1
AW - Aruba 1
BS - Bahamas 1
CG - Congo 1
CI - Costa d'Avorio 1
CZ - Repubblica Ceca 1
DK - Danimarca 1
DM - Dominica 1
DZ - Algeria 1
EE - Estonia 1
EU - Europa 1
Totale 27.576
Salva come PNG Salva come JPEG
Città #
Wilmington 5.300
Woodbridge 5.035
Houston 4.832
Singapore 692
Fairfield 661
San Jose 457
Ashburn 436
Chandler 287
Hong Kong 260
Seattle 248
Beijing 242
Ann Arbor 233
Dublin 222
Cambridge 187
Jacksonville 172
Medford 166
Santa Clara 141
Council Bluffs 127
Tokyo 93
Dearborn 91
Ho Chi Minh City 88
The Dalles 87
New York 86
Los Angeles 83
Lawrence 79
Hangzhou 68
Lauterbourg 68
Nuremberg 63
Rome 62
Hanoi 59
Orem 58
Chicago 46
Buffalo 45
Milan 45
San Diego 43
London 38
Dallas 35
Redondo Beach 34
Moscow 29
São Paulo 28
Creede 22
Menlo Park 21
Sydney 20
Chennai 19
Haiphong 19
Naples 19
Atlanta 18
Seoul 18
Engelhard 17
Helsinki 17
Montreal 17
Redwood City 16
Centrale 14
Johannesburg 14
Rio de Janeiro 14
Brooklyn 13
North Bergen 13
Norwalk 13
Warsaw 13
Mountain View 12
Phoenix 12
San Francisco 12
Verona 12
Brasília 11
Guangzhou 11
Manchester 11
Turin 11
Central 10
Da Nang 10
Lappeenranta 10
Miami 10
Nanjing 10
Shanghai 10
Tampa 10
Tashkent 10
Las Vegas 9
Paris 9
Salt Lake City 9
Vienna 9
Baghdad 8
Blumenau 8
Boardman 8
Denver 8
Hefei 8
Kingston 8
Philadelphia 8
Quito 8
Stockholm 8
Amsterdam 7
Belo Horizonte 7
Boston 7
Kuala Lumpur 7
Lima 7
Mumbai 7
Amman 6
Biên Hòa 6
Can Tho 6
Columbus 6
Curitiba 6
Dhaka 6
Totale 21.701
Salva come PNG Salva come JPEG
Nome #
Gender differences in research collaboration 533
A methodology to measure the effectiveness of academic recruitment and turnover 498
Accounting for gender research performance differences in ranking universities 493
Measuring institutional research productivity for the life sciences: the importance of accounting for the order of authors in the byline 491
A comparison of university performance scores and ranks by MNCS and FSS 486
A farewell to the MNCS and like size-independent indicators 485
Assessing the accuracy of the h and g indexes for measuring researchers’ productivity 477
A farewell to the MNCS and like size-independent indicators: Rejoinder 477
A new bibliometric approach to assess the scientific specialization of regions. 476
The importance of accounting for the number of co-authors and their order when assessing research performance at the individual level in the life sciences 475
An investigation on the skewness patterns and fractal nature of research productivity distributions at field and discipline level 471
Are the authors of highly-cited articles also the most productive ones? 470
National peer-review research assessment exercises for the hard sciences can be a complete waste of money: the Italian case 468
Investigating returns to scope of research fields in universities 465
Selecting competent referees to assess research projects proposals: a study of referees’ registers 461
Selection committees for academic recruitment: Does gender matter? 458
How long do top scientists maintain their stardom? An analysis by region, gender and discipline: evidence from Italy 458
Do interdisciplinary research teams deliver higher gains to science? 458
The ratio of top scientists to the academic staff as an indicator of the competitive strength of universities 457
Inefficiency in selecting products for submission to national research assessment exercises 456
Publication rates in 192 research fields of the hard sciences 453
From rankings to funnel plots: The question of accounting for uncertainty when assessing university research performance 451
On tit for tat: Franceschini and Maisano versus ANVUR regarding the Italian research assessment exercise VQR 2011–2014 444
Variability of research performance across disciplines within universities in non-competitive higher education systems 434
Gender bias in academic recruitment 427
Individual research performance: a proposal for comparing apples to oranges 422
The determinants of academic career advancement: Evidence from Italy 421
The combined effects of age and seniority on research performance of full professors 421
Sistemi innovativi locali e trasferimento tecnologico: il caso del Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche 419
The dispersion of the citation distribution of top scientists’ publications 416
La misurazione della produttività scientifica delle università italiane attraverso una metodologia bibliometrica non-parametrica 411
Refrain from adopting the combination of citation and journal metrics to grade publications, as used in the Italian national research assessment exercise (VQR 2011–2014) 410
Rethinking research evaluation indicators and methods from an economic perspective: the FSS indicator as a proxy of productivity 406
Variation in research collaboration patterns across academic ranks 400
Does your surname affect the citability of your publications? 398
The effect of a country’s name in the title of a publication on its visibility and citability 396
La ricerca pubblica in Italia: per chi suona la campana? 391
The north–south divide in the Italian higher education system 387
The collaboration behaviors of scientists in Italy: a field level analysis 386
Specialization versus diversification in research activities: the extent, intensity and relatedness of field diversification by individual scientists 374
Response to comments on: â Does your surname affect the citability of your publications?â 371
Career advancement and scientific performance in universities 369
La valorizzazione della ricerca pubblica in Italia. Un’indagine empirica 367
The impact of non-productive and top scientists on overall university research performance 363
The suitability of h and g indexes for measuring the productivity of research institutions 362
Who benefits from a country's scientific research? 362
A comparison of two approaches for measuring interdisciplinary research output: The disciplinary diversity of authors vs the disciplinary diversity of the reference list 319
Diversification versus specialization in scientific research: Which strategy pays off? 310
The relationship among research productivity, research collaboration, and their determinants 306
A nation’s foreign and domestic professors: which have better research performance? (the Italian case) 291
The effect of multidisciplinary collaborations on research diversification 290
Predicting publication long-term impact through a combination of early citations and journal impact factor 271
USA vs Russia in the scientific arena 259
Are all citations worth the same? Valuing citations by the value of the citing items 259
The balance of knowledge flows 258
The effects of gender, age and academic rank on research diversification 251
The correlation between the level of internationalization of a country’s scientific production and that of relevant citing publications 233
A gender analysis of top scientists’ collaboration behavior: evidence from Italy 224
Peer review versus bibliometrics: Which method better predicts the scholarly impact of publications? 219
Knowledge spillovers: Does the geographic proximity effect decay over time? A discipline-level analysis, accounting for cognitive proximity, with and without self-citations 215
Gender differences in research diversification behavior 214
When research assessment exercises leave room for opportunistic behavior by the subjects under evaluation 211
Retraction of Predatory publishing in Scopus: evidence on cross-country differences lacks justification 203
The collaboration behavior of top scientists 202
Bibliometrics, the "Clinical Diagnostics" of Research Impact Comment on "'We're Not Providing the Best Care If We Are Not on the Cutting Edge of Research': A Research Impact Evaluation at a Regional Australian Hospital and Health Service" 198
On the relation between the degree of internationalization of cited and citing publications: a field level analysis, including and excluding self-citations 193
Authorship analysis of specialized vs diversified research output 191
The regional balance of knowledge flows 169
Gendered impact of COVID-19 pandemic on research production: a cross-country analysis based on bioRxiv 138
The different responses of universities to introduction of performance-based research funding 130
Gender differences in research performance within and between countries: Italy vs Norway 118
Drivers of academic engagement in public–private research collaboration: an empirical study 99
A bibliometric methodology to unveil territorial inequities in the scientific wealth to combat COVID-19 90
Do the propensity and drivers of academics' engagement in research collaboration with industry vary over time? 88
The impact of Italian performance-based research funding systems on the intensity of international research collaboration 87
Comparison of research performance of Italian and Norwegian professors and universities 87
The role of geographical proximity in knowledge diffusion, measured by citations to scientific literature 87
Enhancing the prediction of publications’ long-term impact using early citations, readerships, and non-scientific factors 86
A novel methodology to assess the scientific standing of nations at field level 85
Inter- and intra-domain knowledge flows: examining their relationship with impact at the field level over time 76
The effects of citation-based research evaluation schemes on self-citation behavior 75
The effect of academic mobility on research performance: The case of Italy 73
Impact of Covid-19 on research output by gender across countries 72
The scientific standing of nations and its relationship with economic competitiveness 72
The domestic localization of knowledge flows as evidenced by publication citation: the case of Italy 71
Does the geographic proximity effect on knowledge spillovers vary across research fields? 71
How the Covid-19 crisis shaped research collaboration behaviour 70
Warnings of declining research productivity: does Italy buck the trend? 70
The moderating role of the territorial research infrastructure on the geographic proximity effect in research collaborations: a regional-based view 67
The moderating role of personal characteristics of authors in the publications’ quality for quantity trade-off 65
Assessing the effects of publication requirements for professorship on research performance and publishing behaviour of Ukrainian academics 64
Unveiling the distinctive traits of a nation's research performance: The case of Italy and Norway 64
Correlating article citedness and journal impact: an empirical investigation by field on a large-scale dataset 63
The scholarly impact of private sector research: a multivariate analysis 62
The role of non-scientific factors vis-à-vis the quality of publications in determining their scholarly impact 61
Do research assessment systems have the potential to hinder scientists from diversifying their research pursuits? 59
Sex bias in peer review and citation practices: Implications for research evaluation 58
How reliable are unsupervised author disambiguation algorithms in the assessment of research organization performance? 57
Public–private research collaborations: longitudinal field-level analysis of determinants, frequency, and impact 56
Were the Italian policy reforms to contrast favoritism and foster effectiveness in faculty recruitment successful? 55
Totale 27.736
Salva come PNG Salva come JPEG
Categoria #
all - tutte 75.273
article - articoli 0
book - libri 0
conference - conferenze 0
curatela - curatele 0
other - altro 0
patent - brevetti 0
selected - selezionate 0
volume - volumi 0
Totale 75.273
Salva come PNG Salva come JPEG


Totale Lug Ago Sett Ott Nov Dic Gen Feb Mar Apr Mag Giu
2021/2022728 0 0 21 83 25 74 40 45 69 85 52 234
2022/2023889 95 58 19 89 66 225 101 83 75 6 44 28
2023/2024335 43 11 14 22 74 51 17 19 8 37 9 30
2024/20252.847 81 520 215 138 126 153 152 103 193 212 514 440
2025/20263.563 209 172 382 225 274 170 416 584 529 273 117 212
2026/2027744 211 363 170 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Totale 28.128