IRIS
ABRAMO, GIOVANNI
 Distribuzione geografica
Salva come PNG Salva come JPEG
Continente #
NA - Nord America 19.816
AS - Asia 3.388
EU - Europa 2.829
SA - Sud America 445
AF - Africa 59
OC - Oceania 27
Continente sconosciuto - Info sul continente non disponibili 1
Totale 26.565
Salva come PNG Salva come JPEG
Nazione #
US - Stati Uniti d'America 19.743
SG - Singapore 1.910
DE - Germania 876
CN - Cina 534
RU - Federazione Russa 440
BR - Brasile 356
IT - Italia 310
HK - Hong Kong 283
VN - Vietnam 267
IE - Irlanda 264
GB - Regno Unito 234
UA - Ucraina 222
SE - Svezia 166
FR - Francia 98
JP - Giappone 97
FI - Finlandia 70
IN - India 58
KR - Corea 50
CA - Canada 36
BD - Bangladesh 33
AR - Argentina 32
AT - Austria 31
NL - Olanda 30
AU - Australia 23
ZA - Sudafrica 22
ES - Italia 19
IQ - Iraq 17
MX - Messico 17
PL - Polonia 17
PK - Pakistan 15
TR - Turchia 14
EC - Ecuador 13
MY - Malesia 13
CO - Colombia 12
ID - Indonesia 12
SA - Arabia Saudita 12
TW - Taiwan 12
UZ - Uzbekistan 11
CL - Cile 9
IR - Iran 9
RO - Romania 9
PE - Perù 8
VE - Venezuela 8
AE - Emirati Arabi Uniti 7
EG - Egitto 7
JO - Giordania 7
KE - Kenya 6
BE - Belgio 5
PY - Paraguay 5
CH - Svizzera 4
ET - Etiopia 4
JM - Giamaica 4
MA - Marocco 4
NZ - Nuova Zelanda 4
PS - Palestinian Territory 4
PT - Portogallo 4
TH - Thailandia 4
AZ - Azerbaigian 3
GE - Georgia 3
GR - Grecia 3
HR - Croazia 3
HU - Ungheria 3
LV - Lettonia 3
MD - Moldavia 3
NO - Norvegia 3
OM - Oman 3
PA - Panama 3
PH - Filippine 3
SI - Slovenia 3
AL - Albania 2
DO - Repubblica Dominicana 2
HN - Honduras 2
KZ - Kazakistan 2
NG - Nigeria 2
NP - Nepal 2
SN - Senegal 2
TN - Tunisia 2
TT - Trinidad e Tobago 2
TZ - Tanzania 2
UY - Uruguay 2
ZM - Zambia 2
AM - Armenia 1
AO - Angola 1
AW - Aruba 1
BA - Bosnia-Erzegovina 1
BB - Barbados 1
CG - Congo 1
CI - Costa d'Avorio 1
CR - Costa Rica 1
CZ - Repubblica Ceca 1
DK - Danimarca 1
DM - Dominica 1
DZ - Algeria 1
EE - Estonia 1
EU - Europa 1
GA - Gabon 1
GT - Guatemala 1
IL - Israele 1
KH - Cambogia 1
LT - Lituania 1
Totale 26.560
Salva come PNG Salva come JPEG
Città #
Wilmington 5.300
Woodbridge 5.034
Houston 4.829
Singapore 689
Fairfield 661
Ashburn 407
San Jose 358
Chandler 287
Hong Kong 256
Seattle 246
Beijing 239
Ann Arbor 233
Dublin 222
Cambridge 187
Jacksonville 170
Medford 166
Santa Clara 126
Tokyo 93
Dearborn 91
The Dalles 85
Ho Chi Minh City 84
Lawrence 79
New York 77
Los Angeles 75
Lauterbourg 68
Hangzhou 66
Nuremberg 63
Hanoi 58
Orem 57
Rome 56
San Diego 43
Buffalo 40
Chicago 39
Milan 38
London 37
Redondo Beach 34
Dallas 29
Moscow 29
São Paulo 28
Council Bluffs 26
Creede 22
Menlo Park 21
Sydney 20
Chennai 19
Haiphong 19
Seoul 18
Engelhard 17
Helsinki 17
Redwood City 16
Montreal 15
Centrale 14
Johannesburg 14
Naples 14
Rio de Janeiro 14
Atlanta 13
North Bergen 13
Norwalk 13
Warsaw 13
Mountain View 12
Guangzhou 11
Brasília 10
Central 10
Lappeenranta 10
Nanjing 10
San Francisco 10
Shanghai 10
Tampa 10
Tashkent 10
Verona 10
Brooklyn 9
Da Nang 9
Manchester 9
Paris 9
Phoenix 9
Salt Lake City 9
Vienna 9
Blumenau 8
Hefei 8
Quito 8
Stockholm 8
Turin 8
Baghdad 7
Boardman 7
Lima 7
Mumbai 7
Amman 6
Amsterdam 6
Belo Horizonte 6
Biên Hòa 6
Can Tho 6
Curitiba 6
Dhaka 6
Frankfurt am Main 6
Kyiv 6
Pingtung City 6
Riyadh 6
Boston 5
Brussels 5
Cedarhurst 5
Elk Grove Village 5
Totale 21.327
Salva come PNG Salva come JPEG
Nome #
Gender differences in research collaboration 522
A methodology to measure the effectiveness of academic recruitment and turnover 492
Measuring institutional research productivity for the life sciences: the importance of accounting for the order of authors in the byline 489
Accounting for gender research performance differences in ranking universities 484
A farewell to the MNCS and like size-independent indicators 482
A comparison of university performance scores and ranks by MNCS and FSS 482
The importance of accounting for the number of co-authors and their order when assessing research performance at the individual level in the life sciences 474
A new bibliometric approach to assess the scientific specialization of regions. 472
A farewell to the MNCS and like size-independent indicators: Rejoinder 470
Assessing the accuracy of the h and g indexes for measuring researchers’ productivity 469
An investigation on the skewness patterns and fractal nature of research productivity distributions at field and discipline level 466
Are the authors of highly-cited articles also the most productive ones? 465
National peer-review research assessment exercises for the hard sciences can be a complete waste of money: the Italian case 461
Investigating returns to scope of research fields in universities 460
Selection committees for academic recruitment: Does gender matter? 457
Inefficiency in selecting products for submission to national research assessment exercises 454
Selecting competent referees to assess research projects proposals: a study of referees’ registers 454
The ratio of top scientists to the academic staff as an indicator of the competitive strength of universities 454
How long do top scientists maintain their stardom? An analysis by region, gender and discipline: evidence from Italy 451
Do interdisciplinary research teams deliver higher gains to science? 451
Publication rates in 192 research fields of the hard sciences 445
From rankings to funnel plots: The question of accounting for uncertainty when assessing university research performance 444
On tit for tat: Franceschini and Maisano versus ANVUR regarding the Italian research assessment exercise VQR 2011–2014 436
Variability of research performance across disciplines within universities in non-competitive higher education systems 428
Gender bias in academic recruitment 420
The determinants of academic career advancement: Evidence from Italy 416
Individual research performance: a proposal for comparing apples to oranges 414
Sistemi innovativi locali e trasferimento tecnologico: il caso del Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche 414
The combined effects of age and seniority on research performance of full professors 414
The dispersion of the citation distribution of top scientists’ publications 409
La misurazione della produttività scientifica delle università italiane attraverso una metodologia bibliometrica non-parametrica 407
Refrain from adopting the combination of citation and journal metrics to grade publications, as used in the Italian national research assessment exercise (VQR 2011–2014) 406
Variation in research collaboration patterns across academic ranks 397
Does your surname affect the citability of your publications? 395
Rethinking research evaluation indicators and methods from an economic perspective: the FSS indicator as a proxy of productivity 394
La ricerca pubblica in Italia: per chi suona la campana? 389
The effect of a country’s name in the title of a publication on its visibility and citability 388
The north–south divide in the Italian higher education system 383
The collaboration behaviors of scientists in Italy: a field level analysis 381
Response to comments on: â Does your surname affect the citability of your publications?â 369
Specialization versus diversification in research activities: the extent, intensity and relatedness of field diversification by individual scientists 368
Career advancement and scientific performance in universities 364
La valorizzazione della ricerca pubblica in Italia. Un’indagine empirica 360
The suitability of h and g indexes for measuring the productivity of research institutions 359
The impact of non-productive and top scientists on overall university research performance 359
Who benefits from a country's scientific research? 357
A comparison of two approaches for measuring interdisciplinary research output: The disciplinary diversity of authors vs the disciplinary diversity of the reference list 312
Diversification versus specialization in scientific research: Which strategy pays off? 300
The relationship among research productivity, research collaboration, and their determinants 295
A nation’s foreign and domestic professors: which have better research performance? (the Italian case) 285
The effect of multidisciplinary collaborations on research diversification 280
Predicting publication long-term impact through a combination of early citations and journal impact factor 263
Are all citations worth the same? Valuing citations by the value of the citing items 252
The balance of knowledge flows 249
The effects of gender, age and academic rank on research diversification 246
The correlation between the level of internationalization of a country’s scientific production and that of relevant citing publications 221
A gender analysis of top scientists’ collaboration behavior: evidence from Italy 218
Peer review versus bibliometrics: Which method better predicts the scholarly impact of publications? 208
Knowledge spillovers: Does the geographic proximity effect decay over time? A discipline-level analysis, accounting for cognitive proximity, with and without self-citations 207
Gender differences in research diversification behavior 204
When research assessment exercises leave room for opportunistic behavior by the subjects under evaluation 202
Retraction of Predatory publishing in Scopus: evidence on cross-country differences lacks justification 199
Bibliometrics, the "Clinical Diagnostics" of Research Impact Comment on "'We're Not Providing the Best Care If We Are Not on the Cutting Edge of Research': A Research Impact Evaluation at a Regional Australian Hospital and Health Service" 195
The collaboration behavior of top scientists 195
On the relation between the degree of internationalization of cited and citing publications: a field level analysis, including and excluding self-citations 186
Authorship analysis of specialized vs diversified research output 180
The regional balance of knowledge flows 159
Gendered impact of COVID-19 pandemic on research production: a cross-country analysis based on bioRxiv 128
The different responses of universities to introduction of performance-based research funding 119
Gender differences in research performance within and between countries: Italy vs Norway 106
Drivers of academic engagement in public–private research collaboration: an empirical study 88
A bibliometric methodology to unveil territorial inequities in the scientific wealth to combat COVID-19 85
Do the propensity and drivers of academics' engagement in research collaboration with industry vary over time? 82
The impact of Italian performance-based research funding systems on the intensity of international research collaboration 81
Comparison of research performance of Italian and Norwegian professors and universities 81
A novel methodology to assess the scientific standing of nations at field level 79
The role of geographical proximity in knowledge diffusion, measured by citations to scientific literature 76
The scientific standing of nations and its relationship with economic competitiveness 69
Impact of Covid-19 on research output by gender across countries 68
Does the geographic proximity effect on knowledge spillovers vary across research fields? 66
Inter- and intra-domain knowledge flows: examining their relationship with impact at the field level over time 65
The effects of citation-based research evaluation schemes on self-citation behavior 65
How the Covid-19 crisis shaped research collaboration behaviour 64
The domestic localization of knowledge flows as evidenced by publication citation: the case of Italy 64
The moderating role of personal characteristics of authors in the publications’ quality for quantity trade-off 62
Warnings of declining research productivity: does Italy buck the trend? 62
Assessing the effects of publication requirements for professorship on research performance and publishing behaviour of Ukrainian academics 61
USA vs Russia in the scientific arena 61
The moderating role of the territorial research infrastructure on the geographic proximity effect in research collaborations: a regional-based view 61
Unveiling the distinctive traits of a nation's research performance: The case of Italy and Norway 60
The effect of academic mobility on research performance: The case of Italy 58
The role of non-scientific factors vis-à-vis the quality of publications in determining their scholarly impact 58
Do research assessment systems have the potential to hinder scientists from diversifying their research pursuits? 56
The scholarly impact of private sector research: a multivariate analysis 56
Correlating article citedness and journal impact: an empirical investigation by field on a large-scale dataset 55
How reliable are unsupervised author disambiguation algorithms in the assessment of research organization performance? 53
Were the Italian policy reforms to contrast favoritism and foster effectiveness in faculty recruitment successful? 51
Public–private research collaborations: longitudinal field-level analysis of determinants, frequency, and impact 51
Do research universities specialize in disciplines where they hold a competitive advantage? 47
Measuring and interpreting the differences of the nations??? scientific specialization indexes by output and by input 46
Totale 26.865
Salva come PNG Salva come JPEG
Categoria #
all - tutte 69.363
article - articoli 0
book - libri 0
conference - conferenze 0
curatela - curatele 0
other - altro 0
patent - brevetti 0
selected - selezionate 0
volume - volumi 0
Totale 69.363
Salva come PNG Salva come JPEG


Totale Lug Ago Sett Ott Nov Dic Gen Feb Mar Apr Mag Giu
2020/2021160 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 122 38
2021/2022850 52 70 21 83 25 74 40 45 69 85 52 234
2022/2023889 95 58 19 89 66 225 101 83 75 6 44 28
2023/2024335 43 11 14 22 74 51 17 19 8 37 9 30
2024/20252.847 81 520 215 138 126 153 152 103 193 212 514 440
2025/20263.288 209 172 382 225 274 170 416 584 529 273 54 0
Totale 27.109