IRIS
ABRAMO, GIOVANNI
 Distribuzione geografica
Salva come PNG Salva come JPEG
Continente #
NA - Nord America 19.133
AS - Asia 2.787
EU - Europa 2.410
SA - Sud America 395
AF - Africa 36
OC - Oceania 24
Continente sconosciuto - Info sul continente non disponibili 1
Totale 24.786
Salva come PNG Salva come JPEG
Nazione #
US - Stati Uniti d'America 19.092
SG - Singapore 1.740
DE - Germania 871
CN - Cina 424
BR - Brasile 330
HK - Hong Kong 273
IE - Irlanda 263
IT - Italia 263
RU - Federazione Russa 236
UA - Ucraina 216
GB - Regno Unito 206
SE - Svezia 166
VN - Vietnam 145
FI - Finlandia 61
KR - Corea 48
AT - Austria 29
BD - Bangladesh 28
FR - Francia 28
IN - India 24
AR - Argentina 22
NL - Olanda 22
AU - Australia 20
CA - Canada 17
PL - Polonia 15
MX - Messico 14
ZA - Sudafrica 13
ES - Italia 12
IQ - Iraq 12
JP - Giappone 12
CO - Colombia 11
TW - Taiwan 11
ID - Indonesia 10
EC - Ecuador 9
IR - Iran 9
TR - Turchia 9
PK - Pakistan 8
RO - Romania 8
PE - Perù 7
UZ - Uzbekistan 7
AE - Emirati Arabi Uniti 5
CL - Cile 5
EG - Egitto 5
VE - Venezuela 5
KE - Kenya 4
MY - Malesia 4
NZ - Nuova Zelanda 4
PY - Paraguay 4
AZ - Azerbaigian 3
ET - Etiopia 3
MA - Marocco 3
SA - Arabia Saudita 3
BE - Belgio 2
CH - Svizzera 2
GE - Georgia 2
GR - Grecia 2
HN - Honduras 2
JM - Giamaica 2
JO - Giordania 2
NG - Nigeria 2
NO - Norvegia 2
PA - Panama 2
SN - Senegal 2
UY - Uruguay 2
ZM - Zambia 2
AL - Albania 1
AM - Armenia 1
CG - Congo 1
CZ - Repubblica Ceca 1
DM - Dominica 1
DO - Repubblica Dominicana 1
EE - Estonia 1
EU - Europa 1
GA - Gabon 1
IL - Israele 1
KH - Cambogia 1
KZ - Kazakistan 1
NP - Nepal 1
OM - Oman 1
PH - Filippine 1
PT - Portogallo 1
SI - Slovenia 1
SK - Slovacchia (Repubblica Slovacca) 1
SV - El Salvador 1
TH - Thailandia 1
TT - Trinidad e Tobago 1
Totale 24.786
Salva come PNG Salva come JPEG
Città #
Wilmington 5.300
Woodbridge 5.034
Houston 4.827
Fairfield 661
Singapore 543
Ashburn 326
Chandler 287
Hong Kong 252
Seattle 246
Ann Arbor 233
Beijing 232
Dublin 220
Cambridge 187
Jacksonville 170
Medford 166
Santa Clara 125
Dearborn 91
Lawrence 79
Los Angeles 72
The Dalles 71
Hangzhou 65
Nuremberg 61
New York 54
Ho Chi Minh City 52
Rome 44
San Diego 43
Milan 37
Chicago 34
Redondo Beach 34
Buffalo 33
Dallas 27
Hanoi 27
London 27
San Jose 27
Creede 22
Menlo Park 21
São Paulo 21
Sydney 18
Engelhard 17
Seoul 17
Redwood City 16
Council Bluffs 15
Centrale 14
Rio de Janeiro 14
Moscow 13
Naples 13
North Bergen 13
Norwalk 13
Haiphong 12
Helsinki 12
Mountain View 12
Lauterbourg 11
Warsaw 11
Atlanta 10
Central 10
Nanjing 10
Tampa 10
Verona 10
Brasília 9
Brooklyn 9
Guangzhou 9
Phoenix 9
Salt Lake City 9
San Francisco 9
Tokyo 9
Blumenau 8
Hefei 8
Johannesburg 8
Shanghai 8
Stockholm 8
Lima 7
Montreal 7
Tashkent 7
Vienna 7
Belo Horizonte 6
Biên Hòa 6
Curitiba 6
Dhaka 6
Lappeenranta 6
Paris 6
Pingtung City 6
Turin 6
Boardman 5
Boston 5
Cedarhurst 5
Elk Grove Village 5
Golestan 5
Manchester 5
Perugia 5
Baghdad 4
Banqiao 4
Canoas 4
Columbus 4
Da Nang 4
Falls Church 4
Hải Dương 4
Lancaster 4
Man Kok 4
Medan 4
Mexico City 4
Totale 20.280
Salva come PNG Salva come JPEG
Nome #
Gender differences in research collaboration 508
Measuring institutional research productivity for the life sciences: the importance of accounting for the order of authors in the byline 477
A methodology to measure the effectiveness of academic recruitment and turnover 474
A comparison of university performance scores and ranks by MNCS and FSS 460
Accounting for gender research performance differences in ranking universities 460
The importance of accounting for the number of co-authors and their order when assessing research performance at the individual level in the life sciences 458
A new bibliometric approach to assess the scientific specialization of regions. 457
A farewell to the MNCS and like size-independent indicators 456
National peer-review research assessment exercises for the hard sciences can be a complete waste of money: the Italian case 452
Assessing the accuracy of the h and g indexes for measuring researchers’ productivity 449
Are the authors of highly-cited articles also the most productive ones? 448
Selecting competent referees to assess research projects proposals: a study of referees’ registers 448
An investigation on the skewness patterns and fractal nature of research productivity distributions at field and discipline level 447
Investigating returns to scope of research fields in universities 445
Inefficiency in selecting products for submission to national research assessment exercises 445
Selection committees for academic recruitment: Does gender matter? 445
A farewell to the MNCS and like size-independent indicators: Rejoinder 440
Do interdisciplinary research teams deliver higher gains to science? 440
The ratio of top scientists to the academic staff as an indicator of the competitive strength of universities 433
Publication rates in 192 research fields of the hard sciences 427
From rankings to funnel plots: The question of accounting for uncertainty when assessing university research performance 424
On tit for tat: Franceschini and Maisano versus ANVUR regarding the Italian research assessment exercise VQR 2011–2014 417
How long do top scientists maintain their stardom? An analysis by region, gender and discipline: evidence from Italy 413
Variability of research performance across disciplines within universities in non-competitive higher education systems 412
Gender bias in academic recruitment 410
Individual research performance: a proposal for comparing apples to oranges 405
Sistemi innovativi locali e trasferimento tecnologico: il caso del Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche 400
La misurazione della produttività scientifica delle università italiane attraverso una metodologia bibliometrica non-parametrica 398
The combined effects of age and seniority on research performance of full professors 397
The determinants of academic career advancement: Evidence from Italy 396
Refrain from adopting the combination of citation and journal metrics to grade publications, as used in the Italian national research assessment exercise (VQR 2011–2014) 393
The dispersion of the citation distribution of top scientists’ publications 391
Does your surname affect the citability of your publications? 382
Variation in research collaboration patterns across academic ranks 378
La ricerca pubblica in Italia: per chi suona la campana? 375
The effect of a country’s name in the title of a publication on its visibility and citability 374
Rethinking research evaluation indicators and methods from an economic perspective: the FSS indicator as a proxy of productivity 364
The collaboration behaviors of scientists in Italy: a field level analysis 363
The north–south divide in the Italian higher education system 361
Specialization versus diversification in research activities: the extent, intensity and relatedness of field diversification by individual scientists 357
Response to comments on: â Does your surname affect the citability of your publications?â 352
Career advancement and scientific performance in universities 347
The suitability of h and g indexes for measuring the productivity of research institutions 346
Who benefits from a country's scientific research? 345
The impact of non-productive and top scientists on overall university research performance 344
La valorizzazione della ricerca pubblica in Italia. Un’indagine empirica 341
A comparison of two approaches for measuring interdisciplinary research output: The disciplinary diversity of authors vs the disciplinary diversity of the reference list 287
Diversification versus specialization in scientific research: Which strategy pays off? 284
The relationship among research productivity, research collaboration, and their determinants 280
The effect of multidisciplinary collaborations on research diversification 262
A nation’s foreign and domestic professors: which have better research performance? (the Italian case) 258
Predicting publication long-term impact through a combination of early citations and journal impact factor 250
Are all citations worth the same? Valuing citations by the value of the citing items 238
The effects of gender, age and academic rank on research diversification 234
The balance of knowledge flows 232
The correlation between the level of internationalization of a country’s scientific production and that of relevant citing publications 207
Knowledge spillovers: Does the geographic proximity effect decay over time? A discipline-level analysis, accounting for cognitive proximity, with and without self-citations 196
A gender analysis of top scientists’ collaboration behavior: evidence from Italy 194
Gender differences in research diversification behavior 193
Peer review versus bibliometrics: Which method better predicts the scholarly impact of publications? 192
When research assessment exercises leave room for opportunistic behavior by the subjects under evaluation 187
The collaboration behavior of top scientists 183
Retraction of Predatory publishing in Scopus: evidence on cross-country differences lacks justification 179
Bibliometrics, the "Clinical Diagnostics" of Research Impact Comment on "'We're Not Providing the Best Care If We Are Not on the Cutting Edge of Research': A Research Impact Evaluation at a Regional Australian Hospital and Health Service" 178
On the relation between the degree of internationalization of cited and citing publications: a field level analysis, including and excluding self-citations 172
Authorship analysis of specialized vs diversified research output 160
The regional balance of knowledge flows 147
Gendered impact of COVID-19 pandemic on research production: a cross-country analysis based on bioRxiv 105
The different responses of universities to introduction of performance-based research funding 96
Gender differences in research performance within and between countries: Italy vs Norway 75
Comparison of research performance of Italian and Norwegian professors and universities 71
The impact of Italian performance-based research funding systems on the intensity of international research collaboration 68
Do the propensity and drivers of academics' engagement in research collaboration with industry vary over time? 66
A bibliometric methodology to unveil territorial inequities in the scientific wealth to combat COVID-19 65
Drivers of academic engagement in public–private research collaboration: an empirical study 64
The role of geographical proximity in knowledge diffusion, measured by citations to scientific literature 63
A novel methodology to assess the scientific standing of nations at field level 59
The scientific standing of nations and its relationship with economic competitiveness 58
Impact of Covid-19 on research output by gender across countries 55
The domestic localization of knowledge flows as evidenced by publication citation: the case of Italy 53
How the Covid-19 crisis shaped research collaboration behaviour 52
Does the geographic proximity effect on knowledge spillovers vary across research fields? 52
The effects of citation-based research evaluation schemes on self-citation behavior 52
The moderating role of the territorial research infrastructure on the geographic proximity effect in research collaborations: a regional-based view 51
Inter- and intra-domain knowledge flows: examining their relationship with impact at the field level over time 50
The moderating role of personal characteristics of authors in the publications’ quality for quantity trade-off 48
Unveiling the distinctive traits of a nation's research performance: The case of Italy and Norway 47
Warnings of declining research productivity: does Italy buck the trend? 45
Do research assessment systems have the potential to hinder scientists from diversifying their research pursuits? 45
The role of non-scientific factors vis-à-vis the quality of publications in determining their scholarly impact 45
The effect of academic mobility on research performance: The case of Italy 43
USA vs Russia in the scientific arena 43
How reliable are unsupervised author disambiguation algorithms in the assessment of research organization performance? 41
Assessing the effects of publication requirements for professorship on research performance and publishing behaviour of Ukrainian academics 41
Were the Italian policy reforms to contrast favoritism and foster effectiveness in faculty recruitment successful? 40
The scholarly impact of private sector research: a multivariate analysis 40
Correlating article citedness and journal impact: an empirical investigation by field on a large-scale dataset 37
Public–private research collaborations: longitudinal field-level analysis of determinants, frequency, and impact 37
Do research universities specialize in disciplines where they hold a competitive advantage? 35
Measuring and interpreting the differences of the nations??? scientific specialization indexes by output and by input 32
Totale 25.241
Salva come PNG Salva come JPEG
Categoria #
all - tutte 65.951
article - articoli 0
book - libri 0
conference - conferenze 0
curatela - curatele 0
other - altro 0
patent - brevetti 0
selected - selezionate 0
volume - volumi 0
Totale 65.951
Salva come PNG Salva come JPEG


Totale Lug Ago Sett Ott Nov Dic Gen Feb Mar Apr Mag Giu
2020/20211.148 0 0 0 0 0 0 487 347 69 85 122 38
2021/2022850 52 70 21 83 25 74 40 45 69 85 52 234
2022/2023889 95 58 19 89 66 225 101 83 75 6 44 28
2023/2024335 43 11 14 22 74 51 17 19 8 37 9 30
2024/20252.847 81 520 215 138 126 153 152 103 193 212 514 440
2025/20261.506 209 172 382 225 274 170 74 0 0 0 0 0
Totale 25.327