The present paper takes its place in the stream of studies that analyze the effect of interdisciplinarity on the impact of research output. Unlike previous studies, in this study the interdisciplinarity of the publications is not inferred through their citing or cited references, but rather by identifying the authors’ designated fields of research. For this we draw on the scientific classification of Italian academics, and their publications as indexed in the WoS over a 5-year period (2004–2008). We divide the publications in three subsets on the basis the nature of co-authorship: those papers coauthored with academics from different fields, which show high intensity of inter-field collaboration (“specific” collaboration, occurring in 110 pairings of fields); those papers coauthored with academics who are simply from different “non-specific” fields; and finally co-authorships within a single field. We then compare the citations of the papers and the impact factor of the publishing journals between the three subsets. The results show significant differences, generally in favor of the interdisciplinary authorships, in only one third (or slightly more) of the cases. The analysis provides the value of the median differences for each pair of publication subsets.

Abramo, G., D'Angelo, C.a., & Di Costa, F. (2017). Do interdisciplinary research teams deliver higher gains to science?. SCIENTOMETRICS, 111(1), 317-336 [10.1007/s11192-017-2253-x].

Do interdisciplinary research teams deliver higher gains to science?

ABRAMO, GIOVANNI;D'ANGELO, CIRIACO ANDREA;
2017

Abstract

The present paper takes its place in the stream of studies that analyze the effect of interdisciplinarity on the impact of research output. Unlike previous studies, in this study the interdisciplinarity of the publications is not inferred through their citing or cited references, but rather by identifying the authors’ designated fields of research. For this we draw on the scientific classification of Italian academics, and their publications as indexed in the WoS over a 5-year period (2004–2008). We divide the publications in three subsets on the basis the nature of co-authorship: those papers coauthored with academics from different fields, which show high intensity of inter-field collaboration (“specific” collaboration, occurring in 110 pairings of fields); those papers coauthored with academics who are simply from different “non-specific” fields; and finally co-authorships within a single field. We then compare the citations of the papers and the impact factor of the publishing journals between the three subsets. The results show significant differences, generally in favor of the interdisciplinary authorships, in only one third (or slightly more) of the cases. The analysis provides the value of the median differences for each pair of publication subsets.
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore ING-IND/35 - Ingegneria Economico-Gestionale
English
Bibliometrics; Interdisciplinary research; Scientific impact; Social Sciences (all); Computer Science Applications1707 Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition; Library and Information Sciences; Law
http://www.springerlink.com/content/0138-9130
Abramo, G., D'Angelo, C.a., & Di Costa, F. (2017). Do interdisciplinary research teams deliver higher gains to science?. SCIENTOMETRICS, 111(1), 317-336 [10.1007/s11192-017-2253-x].
Abramo, G; D'Angelo, Ca; Di Costa, F
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
art%3A10.1007%2Fs11192-017-2253-x_printed version.pdf

non disponibili

Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 389.28 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
389.28 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/2108/180159
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 14
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 15
social impact