The paper provides an empirical examination of how research productivity distributions differ across scientific fields and disciplines. Productivity is measured using the FSS indicator, which embeds both quantity and impact of output. The population studied consists of over 31,000 scientists in 180 fields (10 aggregate disciplines) of a national research system. The Characteristic Scores and Scale technique is used to investigate the distribution patterns for the different fields and disciplines. Research productivity distributions are found to be asymmetrical at the field level, although the degree of skewness varies substantially among the fields within the aggregate disciplines. We also examine whether the field productivity distributions show a fractal nature, which reveals an exception more than a rule. Differently, for the disciplines, the partitions of the distributions show skewed patterns that are highly similar.

Abramo, G., D'Angelo, C.a., Soldatenkova, A. (2017). An investigation on the skewness patterns and fractal nature of research productivity distributions at field and discipline level. JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 11(1), 324-335 [10.1016/j.joi.2017.02.001].

An investigation on the skewness patterns and fractal nature of research productivity distributions at field and discipline level

ABRAMO, GIOVANNI;D'ANGELO, CIRIACO ANDREA;SOLDATENKOVA, ANASTASIIA
2017

Abstract

The paper provides an empirical examination of how research productivity distributions differ across scientific fields and disciplines. Productivity is measured using the FSS indicator, which embeds both quantity and impact of output. The population studied consists of over 31,000 scientists in 180 fields (10 aggregate disciplines) of a national research system. The Characteristic Scores and Scale technique is used to investigate the distribution patterns for the different fields and disciplines. Research productivity distributions are found to be asymmetrical at the field level, although the degree of skewness varies substantially among the fields within the aggregate disciplines. We also examine whether the field productivity distributions show a fractal nature, which reveals an exception more than a rule. Differently, for the disciplines, the partitions of the distributions show skewed patterns that are highly similar.
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore ING-IND/35 - Ingegneria Economico-Gestionale
English
Bibliometrics; CSS; FSS; Italy; Research evaluation; Statistics and Probability; Modeling and Simulation; Computer Science Applications1707 Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition; Management Science and Operations Research; Applied Mathematics
http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-informetrics/
Abramo, G., D'Angelo, C.a., Soldatenkova, A. (2017). An investigation on the skewness patterns and fractal nature of research productivity distributions at field and discipline level. JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 11(1), 324-335 [10.1016/j.joi.2017.02.001].
Abramo, G; D'Angelo, Ca; Soldatenkova, A
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S1751157716303728-main.pdf

non disponibili

Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 933.29 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
933.29 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/180167
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 13
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 12
social impact