We investigate the question of how long top scientists retain their stardom. We observe the research performance of all Italian professors in the sciences over three consecutive four-year periods, between 2001 and 2012. The top scientists of the first period are identified on the basis of research productivity, and their performance is then tracked through time. The analyses demonstrate that more than a third of the nation’s top scientists maintain this status over the three consecutive periods, with higher shares occurring in the life sciences and lower ones in engineering. Compared to males, females are less likely to maintain top status. There are also regional differences, among which top status is less likely to survive in southern Italy than in the north. Finally we investigate the longevity of unproductive professors, and then check whether the career progress of the top and unproductive scientists is aligned with their respective performances. The results appear to have implications for national policies on academic recruitment and advancement.

Abramo, G., D'Angelo, C.a., Soldatenkova, A. (2017). How long do top scientists maintain their stardom? An analysis by region, gender and discipline: evidence from Italy. SCIENTOMETRICS, 110(2), 867-877 [10.1007/s11192-016-2193-x].

How long do top scientists maintain their stardom? An analysis by region, gender and discipline: evidence from Italy

ABRAMO, GIOVANNI;D'ANGELO, CIRIACO ANDREA;SOLDATENKOVA, ANASTASIIA
2017

Abstract

We investigate the question of how long top scientists retain their stardom. We observe the research performance of all Italian professors in the sciences over three consecutive four-year periods, between 2001 and 2012. The top scientists of the first period are identified on the basis of research productivity, and their performance is then tracked through time. The analyses demonstrate that more than a third of the nation’s top scientists maintain this status over the three consecutive periods, with higher shares occurring in the life sciences and lower ones in engineering. Compared to males, females are less likely to maintain top status. There are also regional differences, among which top status is less likely to survive in southern Italy than in the north. Finally we investigate the longevity of unproductive professors, and then check whether the career progress of the top and unproductive scientists is aligned with their respective performances. The results appear to have implications for national policies on academic recruitment and advancement.
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore ING-IND/35 - Ingegneria Economico-Gestionale
English
Bibliometrics; Italy; Matthew effect; Research evaluation; Research productivity; Social Sciences (all); Computer Science Applications1707 Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition; Library and Information Sciences; Law
http://www.springerlink.com/content/0138-9130
Abramo, G., D'Angelo, C.a., Soldatenkova, A. (2017). How long do top scientists maintain their stardom? An analysis by region, gender and discipline: evidence from Italy. SCIENTOMETRICS, 110(2), 867-877 [10.1007/s11192-016-2193-x].
Abramo, G; D'Angelo, Ca; Soldatenkova, A
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
art%3A10.1007%2Fs11192-016-2193-x_PRINT VERSION.pdf

non disponibili

Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 385.7 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
385.7 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/180156
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 11
social impact