This work presents a comparative review and classification between some well-known thermodynamically consistent models of hydrogel behavior in a large deformation setting, specifically focusing on solvent absorption/desorption and its impact on mechanical deformation and network swelling. The proposed discussion addresses formulation aspects, general mathematical classification of the governing equations, and numerical implementation issues based on the finite element method. The theories are presented in a unified framework demonstrating that, despite not being evident in some cases, all of them follow equivalent thermodynamic arguments. A detailed computational analysis is carried out where Taylor–Hood elements are employed in the spatial discretization to satisfy the inf-sup condition and to prevent spurious numerical oscillations. The resulting discrete problems are solved using the FEniCS platform through consistent variational formulations, employing both monolithic and staggered approaches. We conduct benchmark tests on various hydrogel structures, demonstrating that major differences arise from the chosen volumetric response of the hydrogel. The significance of this choice is frequently underestimated in the state-of-the-art literature but has been shown to have substantial implications on the resulting hydrogel behavior.

Urrea-Quintero, J.-., Marino, M., Wick, T., Nackenhorst, U. (2024). A comparative analysis of transient finite-strain coupled diffusion-deformation theories for hydrogels. ARCHIVES OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING [10.1007/s11831-024-10101-x].

A comparative analysis of transient finite-strain coupled diffusion-deformation theories for hydrogels

Marino M.;
2024-01-01

Abstract

This work presents a comparative review and classification between some well-known thermodynamically consistent models of hydrogel behavior in a large deformation setting, specifically focusing on solvent absorption/desorption and its impact on mechanical deformation and network swelling. The proposed discussion addresses formulation aspects, general mathematical classification of the governing equations, and numerical implementation issues based on the finite element method. The theories are presented in a unified framework demonstrating that, despite not being evident in some cases, all of them follow equivalent thermodynamic arguments. A detailed computational analysis is carried out where Taylor–Hood elements are employed in the spatial discretization to satisfy the inf-sup condition and to prevent spurious numerical oscillations. The resulting discrete problems are solved using the FEniCS platform through consistent variational formulations, employing both monolithic and staggered approaches. We conduct benchmark tests on various hydrogel structures, demonstrating that major differences arise from the chosen volumetric response of the hydrogel. The significance of this choice is frequently underestimated in the state-of-the-art literature but has been shown to have substantial implications on the resulting hydrogel behavior.
2024
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Recensione
Esperti anonimi
Settore ICAR/08
English
Urrea-Quintero, J.-., Marino, M., Wick, T., Nackenhorst, U. (2024). A comparative analysis of transient finite-strain coupled diffusion-deformation theories for hydrogels. ARCHIVES OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING [10.1007/s11831-024-10101-x].
Urrea-Quintero, J-; Marino, M; Wick, T; Nackenhorst, U
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2024-UrreaQuintero_A Comparative Analysis of Transient Finite‐Strain Coupled Diffusion‐Deformation Theories for Hydrogels.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 4.9 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.9 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/366183
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact