Mucinous and Signet-Ring Cell Colonic Adenocarcinoma in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Case-Control Study

Simple Summary Chronic active inflammation is a known risk factor for colorectal cancer (CRC) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), while the adenoma-carcinoma sequence appears to be associated with sporadic CRC. In the general population, mucinous and signet-ring cell adenocarcinomas are characterized by a worse prognosis. In IBD, a higher frequency of these CRC histotypes has been reported. In the present study, we investigated the frequency and characteristics of mucinous and signet-ring cell adenocarcinomas in patients with IBD versus age-matched non-IBD Controls. CRC was more frequently represented by mucinous/signet-ring cell adenocarcinoma in IBD than in Controls. In rectal CRC, there was a higher proportion of mucinous/signet-ring cell adenocarcinoma vs. standard adenocarcinoma in IBD but not in non-IBD Controls. No risk factors for these two CRC histotypes were identified in IBD. Present findings support that the frequency of mucinous/signet-ring cell colorectal adenocarcinoma is higher in IBD, being associated with rectal involvement of CRC. A higher frequency of mucinous and signet-ring cell colonic adenocarcinoma has been reported in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The primary aim was to investigate the frequency of mucinous and signet-ring cell colorectal adenocarcinoma in patients with IBD (Cases) versus age-matched non-IBD Controls. The secondary aims were to compare the characteristics of these two histotypes of colorectal cancer (CRC) in IBD patients vs. Controls and to search for specific risk factors in IBD. In a case-control study, all IBD patients with CRC diagnosed from 2000 to 2022 were enrolled and matched for age (1:2) with non-IBD Controls with CRC. The study population included 120 CRC patients (40 IBD, 80 Controls). In IBD, CRC included standard adenocarcinoma in 23 (57.5%) patients mucinous/signet-ring cell adenocarcinoma in 17 (42.5%) patients. The proportion of mucinous/signet-ring cell adenocarcinoma was higher in IBD than in Controls (17 [42.5%] vs. 18 [22.5%]; p = 0.03). In rectal CRC, the proportion of mucinous/signet-ring cell adenocarcinoma was higher than standard adenocarcinoma in IBD (8 [47.1%] vs. 4 [17.4%]; p = 0.04) but not in Controls (4 [22.2%] vs. 20 [32.2%]; p = 0.59). In rectal CRC, the proportion of these two histotypes was higher in Cases than in Controls (8/12 [66.6%] vs. 4/24 [16.6%]; p = 0.008), with no risk factors identified in IBD. CRC was more frequently represented by mucinous/signet-ring cell adenocarcinoma in IBD than in age-matched non-IBD Controls. In IBD, these two CRC histotypes were more frequent in the rectum.