This work concerns a system based on EMG sensors, signal conditioning circuitry, classification algorithm based on Artificial Neural Network, and virtual avatar representation, useful to identify hand movements within a set of five. This is to potentially make any trans-radial upper-limb amputee able to drive a virtual or real limb prosthetic hand. When using six EMG sensors, the system is able to recognize with an accuracy of 88.8% the gestures performed by a subject, and replicated by an avatar. Here we focused on differences resulting with the adoption of a different number of sensors and therefore, by means of a very simple heuristic method, we compared different subsets of features, excluding the less significant sensors. We found optimal subsets of one, two, three, four and five sensors, demonstrating a decrease of the performance of only 0.8% when using five sensors, while with three sensors the accuracy can be as high as 81.7%.
Costantini, G., Saggio, G., Quitadamo, L., Casali, D., Leggieri, L., Gruppioni, E. (2014). Sensor reduction on EMG-based hand gesture classification. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Neural Computation Theory and Applications (NCTA 2014) (pp.138-143). Lisboa : SCITEPRESS – Science and Technology Publications.
Sensor reduction on EMG-based hand gesture classification
COSTANTINI, GIOVANNI;SAGGIO, GIOVANNI;
2014-01-01
Abstract
This work concerns a system based on EMG sensors, signal conditioning circuitry, classification algorithm based on Artificial Neural Network, and virtual avatar representation, useful to identify hand movements within a set of five. This is to potentially make any trans-radial upper-limb amputee able to drive a virtual or real limb prosthetic hand. When using six EMG sensors, the system is able to recognize with an accuracy of 88.8% the gestures performed by a subject, and replicated by an avatar. Here we focused on differences resulting with the adoption of a different number of sensors and therefore, by means of a very simple heuristic method, we compared different subsets of features, excluding the less significant sensors. We found optimal subsets of one, two, three, four and five sensors, demonstrating a decrease of the performance of only 0.8% when using five sensors, while with three sensors the accuracy can be as high as 81.7%.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
50405.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Licenza:
Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione
492.93 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
492.93 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.