This paper presents short report on the activities of TC204 Working Group on "Guidelines to compare field or physical model observations with numerical simulations". The main objective of the WG is that of proposing recommendations concerning the comparison between calculated and observed behaviour, specifically adapted for the type of works covered by TC204, i.e. tunnels and open excavations in soft ground

Viggiani, G. (2012). Guidelines for comparing field or physical model observations with numerical simulations. In Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground (pp.1065-1069). Taylor & Francis.

Guidelines for comparing field or physical model observations with numerical simulations

VIGGIANI, GIULIA
2012-01-01

Abstract

This paper presents short report on the activities of TC204 Working Group on "Guidelines to compare field or physical model observations with numerical simulations". The main objective of the WG is that of proposing recommendations concerning the comparison between calculated and observed behaviour, specifically adapted for the type of works covered by TC204, i.e. tunnels and open excavations in soft ground
7th International symposium on geotechnical aspects of underground construction in soft ground
Roma, Italia
2011
7
TC204 ISSMGE
Rilevanza internazionale
su invito
2011
2012
Settore ICAR/07 - GEOTECNICA
English
Open excavations; physical model; soft ground; working groups
Intervento a convegno
Viggiani, G. (2012). Guidelines for comparing field or physical model observations with numerical simulations. In Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground (pp.1065-1069). Taylor & Francis.
Viggiani, G
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

Questo articolo è pubblicato sotto una Licenza Licenza Creative Commons Creative Commons

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/75453
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact