Global floodplain mapping has rapidly progressed over the past few years. Different methods have been proposed to identify areas prone to river flooding, resulting in a plethora of available products. Here we assess the potential and limitations of two main paradigms and provide guidance on the use of these global products in assessing flood risk in data-poor regions.
Di Baldassarre, G., Nardi, F., Annis, A., Odongo, V., Rusca, M., Grimaldi, S. (2020). Brief communication: comparing hydrological and hydrogeomorphic paradigms for global flood hazard mapping. NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 20(5), 1415-1419 [10.5194/nhess-20-1415-2020].
Brief communication: comparing hydrological and hydrogeomorphic paradigms for global flood hazard mapping
Fernando Nardi;
2020-01-01
Abstract
Global floodplain mapping has rapidly progressed over the past few years. Different methods have been proposed to identify areas prone to river flooding, resulting in a plethora of available products. Here we assess the potential and limitations of two main paradigms and provide guidance on the use of these global products in assessing flood risk in data-poor regions.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2020_Di Baldassarre et al (NHESS) Comparing top-down and bottom-up approaches floodplain.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Documento in Pre-print
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
342.01 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
342.01 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
