Multiaxial strength envelopes have been recently proposed as a rational approach for the design of pile foundations subjected to inclined and eccentric loads, leading to more economical solutions with respect to standard methods applied in the design practice. Theoretical solutions based on the application of the Upper-Bound (UB) and Lower-Bound (LB) theorem of Limit Analysis have been proposed to derive the ultimate failure domain of pile groups. In this paper, theoretical predictions for a 4×1 pile group embedded in a homogeneous clayey soil deposit are validated against the results of numerical analyses carried out with the Finite Element code Abaqus. To take into account the nonlinear behaviour of reinforced concrete piles, a damaged plasticity model was used for the concrete, while the reinforcing bars were modelled as equivalent elastoplastic shell elements. The soil was modelled as a standard elastic-perfectly plastic material with a Tresca failure criterion to represent the undrained soil behaviour in a total stress analysis.

Potini, F., Conti, R. (2023). A comparison between theoretical and numerical ultimate failure domains for pile groups. In Geotechnical Engineering in the Digital and Technological Innovation Era (pp.468-476). Cham : Springer Cham [10.1007/978-3-031-34761-0_57].

A comparison between theoretical and numerical ultimate failure domains for pile groups

Riccardo Conti
2023-01-01

Abstract

Multiaxial strength envelopes have been recently proposed as a rational approach for the design of pile foundations subjected to inclined and eccentric loads, leading to more economical solutions with respect to standard methods applied in the design practice. Theoretical solutions based on the application of the Upper-Bound (UB) and Lower-Bound (LB) theorem of Limit Analysis have been proposed to derive the ultimate failure domain of pile groups. In this paper, theoretical predictions for a 4×1 pile group embedded in a homogeneous clayey soil deposit are validated against the results of numerical analyses carried out with the Finite Element code Abaqus. To take into account the nonlinear behaviour of reinforced concrete piles, a damaged plasticity model was used for the concrete, while the reinforcing bars were modelled as equivalent elastoplastic shell elements. The soil was modelled as a standard elastic-perfectly plastic material with a Tresca failure criterion to represent the undrained soil behaviour in a total stress analysis.
8th Italian National Conference of the Researchers of Geotechnical Engineering CNRIG23
Palermo, Italy
2023
8
Rilevanza nazionale
2023
Settore CEAR-05/A - Geotecnica
English
Intervento a convegno
Potini, F., Conti, R. (2023). A comparison between theoretical and numerical ultimate failure domains for pile groups. In Geotechnical Engineering in the Digital and Technological Innovation Era (pp.468-476). Cham : Springer Cham [10.1007/978-3-031-34761-0_57].
Potini, F; Conti, R
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2023_CNRIG_Potini_Conti.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Pre-print
Licenza: Non specificato
Dimensione 839.73 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
839.73 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/394410
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact