In the present work, an indirect competitive electrochemical enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) has been used for determination of aflatoxin B 1 (AFB 1) in barley. The method involves the use of disposable screen-printed carbon electrodes (SPCEs) and anti-aflatoxin B 1 monoclonal antibodies (MAb) for immunosensor development. The specificity of the assay was assessed by studying the cross-reactivity of the MAb relative to AFB 1 . The results indicated that the MAb could readily distinguish AFB 1 from other toxins, with the exception of AFG 1 . The stability of the coating reagents was evaluated using SPCEs coated with AFB 1-bovine serum albumin (BSA) conjugate. The results showed that the coated electrodes could be used for up to one month after their preparation and storage at 4 degrees C. Prior to evaluating the performance of the electrochemical immunosensor for AFB 1 with spiked samples, the effect of barley extract on assay performance was tested. Using this calibration method, the limit of detection (LOD) was found to be 90 pg mL(-1) . The linear range was 0.1-10 ng mL(-1) , and recoveries ranged from 100%-125%. The results obtained were confirmed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled with fluorescence detection. These results demonstrated the suitability of the proposed method for routine screening of AFB 1 in barley.

Ammida, N., Micheli, L., Piermarini, S., MOSCONE DINIA, D., Palleschi, G. (2006). Detection of aflatoxin B-1 in barley: Comparative study of immunosensor and HPLC. In Analytical Letters (pp.1559-1572). PHILADELPHIA : TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC [10.1080/00032710600713248].

Detection of aflatoxin B-1 in barley: Comparative study of immunosensor and HPLC

MICHELI, LAURA;PIERMARINI, SILVIA;MOSCONE DINIA, DANILA;PALLESCHI, GIUSEPPE
2006-01-01

Abstract

In the present work, an indirect competitive electrochemical enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) has been used for determination of aflatoxin B 1 (AFB 1) in barley. The method involves the use of disposable screen-printed carbon electrodes (SPCEs) and anti-aflatoxin B 1 monoclonal antibodies (MAb) for immunosensor development. The specificity of the assay was assessed by studying the cross-reactivity of the MAb relative to AFB 1 . The results indicated that the MAb could readily distinguish AFB 1 from other toxins, with the exception of AFG 1 . The stability of the coating reagents was evaluated using SPCEs coated with AFB 1-bovine serum albumin (BSA) conjugate. The results showed that the coated electrodes could be used for up to one month after their preparation and storage at 4 degrees C. Prior to evaluating the performance of the electrochemical immunosensor for AFB 1 with spiked samples, the effect of barley extract on assay performance was tested. Using this calibration method, the limit of detection (LOD) was found to be 90 pg mL(-1) . The linear range was 0.1-10 ng mL(-1) , and recoveries ranged from 100%-125%. The results obtained were confirmed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled with fluorescence detection. These results demonstrated the suitability of the proposed method for routine screening of AFB 1 in barley.
2nd International Workshop on Biosensors for Food Safety and Environmental Monitoring
Agadir, MOROCCO
NOV 10-12, 2005
2
Prof. Aziz Amine
Rilevanza internazionale
contributo
2006
Settore CHIM/01 - CHIMICA ANALITICA
English
aflatoxin B 1; electrochemical immunosensor; ELISA; HPLC; barley
Intervento a convegno
Ammida, N., Micheli, L., Piermarini, S., MOSCONE DINIA, D., Palleschi, G. (2006). Detection of aflatoxin B-1 in barley: Comparative study of immunosensor and HPLC. In Analytical Letters (pp.1559-1572). PHILADELPHIA : TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC [10.1080/00032710600713248].
Ammida, N; Micheli, L; Piermarini, S; MOSCONE DINIA, D; Palleschi, G
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/38860
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 57
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 50
social impact