Robustness against Electronic Warfare/Electronic Defence attacks represents an important advantage of Noise Radar Technology (NRT). An evaluation of the related Low Probability of Detection (LPD) and of Intercept (LPI) is presented for Continuous Emission Noise Radar (CE‐NR) waveforms with different operational parameters, that is, “tailored”, and with various “degrees of randomness”. In this frame, three different noise radar waveforms, a phase Noise (APCN) and two “tailored” noise waveforms (FMeth and COSPAR), are compared by time–frequency analysis. Using a correlator (i.e. a two antennas) receiver, assuming a complete knowledge of the band (B) and duration (T) of the coherent emission of these waveforms, it will be shown that the LPD features of a CE‐NR do not significantly differ from those of any CE radar transmitting deterministic waveforms. However, in real operations, B and T are unknown; hence, assuming an instantaneous bandwidth estimation will show that the duration T can be estimated only for some specific “tailored” waveforms (of course, not to be operationally used). The effect of “tailoring” is analysed with prospects for future work. Finally, some limitations in the classification of these radar signals are analysed.

Galati, G., Pavan, G. (2024). On the anti‐intercept features of noise radars. IET RADAR, SONAR & NAVIGATION [10.1049/rsn2.12504].

On the anti‐intercept features of noise radars

Gaspare Galati;Gabriele Pavan
2024-04-01

Abstract

Robustness against Electronic Warfare/Electronic Defence attacks represents an important advantage of Noise Radar Technology (NRT). An evaluation of the related Low Probability of Detection (LPD) and of Intercept (LPI) is presented for Continuous Emission Noise Radar (CE‐NR) waveforms with different operational parameters, that is, “tailored”, and with various “degrees of randomness”. In this frame, three different noise radar waveforms, a phase Noise (APCN) and two “tailored” noise waveforms (FMeth and COSPAR), are compared by time–frequency analysis. Using a correlator (i.e. a two antennas) receiver, assuming a complete knowledge of the band (B) and duration (T) of the coherent emission of these waveforms, it will be shown that the LPD features of a CE‐NR do not significantly differ from those of any CE radar transmitting deterministic waveforms. However, in real operations, B and T are unknown; hence, assuming an instantaneous bandwidth estimation will show that the duration T can be estimated only for some specific “tailored” waveforms (of course, not to be operationally used). The effect of “tailoring” is analysed with prospects for future work. Finally, some limitations in the classification of these radar signals are analysed.
apr-2024
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore ING-INF/03
English
Electronic warfare; LPI radar; Radar waveforms
Galati, G., Pavan, G. (2024). On the anti‐intercept features of noise radars. IET RADAR, SONAR & NAVIGATION [10.1049/rsn2.12504].
Galati, G; Pavan, G
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
IET Radar Sonar Navi - 2024 - Galati - On the anti‐intercept features of noise radars.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 4.84 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.84 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/361065
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact