The paper reflects on the formative potential and the limits of a typology of feedback scarcely explored in the literature, the collective feedback in the field of online education. The study evaluates the quality of formative feedbacks in a Professional Development Program on school evaluation addressing 194 Italian teachers. The didactic model adopted is described whilst lingering on the formative value of the collective feedback provided by the e-tutors. In addition, a qualitative- quantitative analysis of 24 cases of collective feedback is presented. The analysis, based on Hattie e Timperley’s feedback model, highlighted the presence of different feedback goals (feeding up/back/forward), with a focus on the task and learning process, and sometimes, on its self-regulation. The lower presence of suggestions for improvement and indications for self-regulation shows some limitations of collective feedback in facilitating situated processes of self-regulation. On the other hand, the articulation of the feedback and the presence of authentic examples that increase the possibility of peer learning for teachers’ professional development, emerge as strengths.
Romiti, S., Fabbro, F., Mattarelli, E. (2023). Collective feedback as a formative assessment practice in an e-learning platform for teachers’ professional development. Q-TIMES WEBMAGAZINE, 2(1), 563-576.
Collective feedback as a formative assessment practice in an e-learning platform for teachers’ professional development
Fabbro Francesco;
2023-02-01
Abstract
The paper reflects on the formative potential and the limits of a typology of feedback scarcely explored in the literature, the collective feedback in the field of online education. The study evaluates the quality of formative feedbacks in a Professional Development Program on school evaluation addressing 194 Italian teachers. The didactic model adopted is described whilst lingering on the formative value of the collective feedback provided by the e-tutors. In addition, a qualitative- quantitative analysis of 24 cases of collective feedback is presented. The analysis, based on Hattie e Timperley’s feedback model, highlighted the presence of different feedback goals (feeding up/back/forward), with a focus on the task and learning process, and sometimes, on its self-regulation. The lower presence of suggestions for improvement and indications for self-regulation shows some limitations of collective feedback in facilitating situated processes of self-regulation. On the other hand, the articulation of the feedback and the presence of authentic examples that increase the possibility of peer learning for teachers’ professional development, emerge as strengths.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
romiti-et-al_qtimes-jetss_feb23_1.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
399.64 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
399.64 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.