In debates about the potential role of the Internet in promoting civic engagement, interactivity is often seen to be synonymous with democratic participation and collaborative learning. The present article assesses whether online interaction is seen as something desirable in lived experience by analyzing the formation of interactivity discourse as an ideological dilemma. The article illustrates how the young Italian producers of three civic websites use and make sense of interactive applications in the context of their experiences and aims. In interviews with these producers, interactivity emerged as a problematic issue to deal with rather than a key feature of the medium in involving citizens in civic action and debate. The combination of the interactive nature of the Internet, the unequal power relations characterizing the online domain, and a potential openness to adversarial views can lead to the paradox of a further restriction of (online) participation by those who intend to promote it. Consequently, online interaction, even when accompanied with democratic aims, does not necessarily promote civic participation and collaborative learning. The article concludes by arguing that interactivity can become a learning opportunity when its use or nonuse is accompanied by critical reflection on our own social practices in the (online) public sphere.

Fabbro, F. (2010). Interactivity as ideological dilemma. A socially−situated reading of interactivity discourse in three civic sites in the Italian context. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEARNING AND MEDIA, 2, 81-93 [10.1162/ijlm_a_00043].

Interactivity as ideological dilemma. A socially−situated reading of interactivity discourse in three civic sites in the Italian context

Francesco Fabbro
2010-01-01

Abstract

In debates about the potential role of the Internet in promoting civic engagement, interactivity is often seen to be synonymous with democratic participation and collaborative learning. The present article assesses whether online interaction is seen as something desirable in lived experience by analyzing the formation of interactivity discourse as an ideological dilemma. The article illustrates how the young Italian producers of three civic websites use and make sense of interactive applications in the context of their experiences and aims. In interviews with these producers, interactivity emerged as a problematic issue to deal with rather than a key feature of the medium in involving citizens in civic action and debate. The combination of the interactive nature of the Internet, the unequal power relations characterizing the online domain, and a potential openness to adversarial views can lead to the paradox of a further restriction of (online) participation by those who intend to promote it. Consequently, online interaction, even when accompanied with democratic aims, does not necessarily promote civic participation and collaborative learning. The article concludes by arguing that interactivity can become a learning opportunity when its use or nonuse is accompanied by critical reflection on our own social practices in the (online) public sphere.
2010
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore M-PED/04 - PEDAGOGIA SPERIMENTALE
English
interactivity discourse
civic participation
collaborative learning
ideological dilemmas
case studies
Fabbro, F. (2010). Interactivity as ideological dilemma. A socially−situated reading of interactivity discourse in three civic sites in the Italian context. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEARNING AND MEDIA, 2, 81-93 [10.1162/ijlm_a_00043].
Fabbro, F
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
FF, interactivity as ideologial dilemma.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 125.22 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
125.22 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/314453
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact