We investigate opinion dynamics in multi-agent networks when there exists a bias toward one of two possible opinions; for example, reflecting a status quo vs a superior alternative. Starting with all agents sharing an initial opinion representing the status quo, the system evolves in steps. In each step, one agent selected uniformly at random adopts with some probability a the superior opinion, and with probability 1 - a it follows an underlying update rule to revise its opinion on the basis of those held by its neighbors. We analyze the convergence of the resulting process under two well-known update rules, namely majority and voter. The framework we propose exhibits a rich structure, with a nonobvious interplay between topology and underlying update rule. For example, for the voter rule we show that the speed of convergence bears no significant dependence on the underlying topology, whereas the picture changes completely under the majority rule, where network density negatively affects convergence. We believe that the model we propose is at the same time simple, rich, and modular, affording mathematical characterization of the interplay between bias, underlying opinion dynamics, and social structure in a unified setting.

Anagnostopoulos, A., Becchetti, L., Cruciani, E., Pasquale, F., Rizzo, S. (2020). Biased opinion dynamics: when the devil is in the details. In Proceedings of the 29th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp.53-59). International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence.

Biased opinion dynamics: when the devil is in the details

Pasquale F.;
2020-01-01

Abstract

We investigate opinion dynamics in multi-agent networks when there exists a bias toward one of two possible opinions; for example, reflecting a status quo vs a superior alternative. Starting with all agents sharing an initial opinion representing the status quo, the system evolves in steps. In each step, one agent selected uniformly at random adopts with some probability a the superior opinion, and with probability 1 - a it follows an underlying update rule to revise its opinion on the basis of those held by its neighbors. We analyze the convergence of the resulting process under two well-known update rules, namely majority and voter. The framework we propose exhibits a rich structure, with a nonobvious interplay between topology and underlying update rule. For example, for the voter rule we show that the speed of convergence bears no significant dependence on the underlying topology, whereas the picture changes completely under the majority rule, where network density negatively affects convergence. We believe that the model we propose is at the same time simple, rich, and modular, affording mathematical characterization of the interplay between bias, underlying opinion dynamics, and social structure in a unified setting.
29th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2020
2020
International Joint Conferences on Artifical Intelligence (IJCAI)
Rilevanza internazionale
2020
Settore INF/01 - INFORMATICA
English
Intervento a convegno
Anagnostopoulos, A., Becchetti, L., Cruciani, E., Pasquale, F., Rizzo, S. (2020). Biased opinion dynamics: when the devil is in the details. In Proceedings of the 29th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp.53-59). International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence.
Anagnostopoulos, A; Becchetti, L; Cruciani, E; Pasquale, F; Rizzo, S
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
0008.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 165.12 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
165.12 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/297721
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 14
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 12
social impact