Major international organizations such as the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), the United Nations (UN), and the European Union (EU) have stressed the importance of risk management as a useful mechanism to prevent corruption. Anticorruption laws or regulations have been developed around the world, both at regional and national level. These aim to support the design and implementation of proactive management of corruption risks in the public sector. This article aimed to investigate the relationship between stakeholder engagement and the extent of implementation of corruption risk management systems by public organizations. We analysed the anticorruption plans of 343 Italian administrations to explore how different categories of stakeholders (i.e. employees, governing bodies, users/citizens associations) can contribute to the corruption risk management process. We found that the involvement of external and internal stakeholders can positively affect the extent of implementation of corruption risk management systems by public organizations. We explained our results by referring to both traditional organizational theories (institutional theory and the resource-based view) and public governance theories (collaborative and inclusive governance). Institutional pressures, knowledge and values emerged as keys to understanding the results.

Monteduro, F., Cecchetti, I., Lai, Y., Allegrini, V. (2021). Does stakeholder engagement affect corruption risk management?. THE JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT AND GOVERNANCE, 25, 759-785 [10.1007/s10997-020-09527-9].

Does stakeholder engagement affect corruption risk management?

Fabio Monteduro
Writing – Review & Editing
;
2021-09-01

Abstract

Major international organizations such as the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), the United Nations (UN), and the European Union (EU) have stressed the importance of risk management as a useful mechanism to prevent corruption. Anticorruption laws or regulations have been developed around the world, both at regional and national level. These aim to support the design and implementation of proactive management of corruption risks in the public sector. This article aimed to investigate the relationship between stakeholder engagement and the extent of implementation of corruption risk management systems by public organizations. We analysed the anticorruption plans of 343 Italian administrations to explore how different categories of stakeholders (i.e. employees, governing bodies, users/citizens associations) can contribute to the corruption risk management process. We found that the involvement of external and internal stakeholders can positively affect the extent of implementation of corruption risk management systems by public organizations. We explained our results by referring to both traditional organizational theories (institutional theory and the resource-based view) and public governance theories (collaborative and inclusive governance). Institutional pressures, knowledge and values emerged as keys to understanding the results.
1-set-2021
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore SECS-P/07 - ECONOMIA AZIENDALE
Settore ECON-06/A - Economia aziendale
English
Corruption prevention
Risk management
Public sector
Stakeholder engagement
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10997-020-09527-9#citeas
Monteduro, F., Cecchetti, I., Lai, Y., Allegrini, V. (2021). Does stakeholder engagement affect corruption risk management?. THE JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT AND GOVERNANCE, 25, 759-785 [10.1007/s10997-020-09527-9].
Monteduro, F; Cecchetti, I; Lai, Y; Allegrini, V
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
s10997-020-09527-9 (1).pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.11 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.11 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/262900
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 8
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact