OBJECTIVE: To compare in vivo Titanium Alloy (TiA) with Stainless Steel (SS) miniscrews Temporary Anchorage Devices (TADs) using removal torque and Scanning Electron Microscopic (SEM) analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 15 subjects (6 males and 9 females) who required maximum anchorage were recruited. For each patient, a TiA TAD and a SS TAD with same length and width were implanted following a randomized splitmouth study design. Retraction was carried out with nickel-titanium spring ligated directly from the anterior hooks of the archwire to the TADs to produce 90 to 100 g of force. When no further anchorage supplementation was needed, the TADs were removed. The removal torque values were registered with a digital screwdriver. After removal, the TADs were collected in a fixed solution and examined using SEM and X-ray microanalysis. RESULTS: All TADs remained intact, with a 100% success rate. There was no difference in removal torque between TiA and SS miniscrews (4.4 ± 1.3 N-cm and 5.1 ± 0.7 N-cm, respectively). All specimens' loss of gloss with signs of biological contaminations resulted in a dull implant surface. SEM photomicrographs of TiA miniscrews showed predominantly blood cells while SS miniscrews showed the precipitation of an amorphous layer with low cellular component. There was no difference in spectroscopic analysis between TiA and SS miniscrews. CONCLUSIONS: TiA and SS miniscrews had comparable removal torque values. SEM photomicrographs showed no evidence of osteointegration with both TADs having similar biological responses.

Bollero, P., Di Fazio, V., Pavoni, C., Cordaro, M., Cozza, P., Lione, R. (2018). Titanium alloy vs. stainless steel miniscrews: An in vivo split-mouth study. EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 22(8), 2191-2198 [10.26355/eurrev-201804-14803].

Titanium alloy vs. stainless steel miniscrews: An in vivo split-mouth study

Bollero, P.;Pavoni, C.;Cozza, P.;Lione, R.
2018-01-01

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare in vivo Titanium Alloy (TiA) with Stainless Steel (SS) miniscrews Temporary Anchorage Devices (TADs) using removal torque and Scanning Electron Microscopic (SEM) analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 15 subjects (6 males and 9 females) who required maximum anchorage were recruited. For each patient, a TiA TAD and a SS TAD with same length and width were implanted following a randomized splitmouth study design. Retraction was carried out with nickel-titanium spring ligated directly from the anterior hooks of the archwire to the TADs to produce 90 to 100 g of force. When no further anchorage supplementation was needed, the TADs were removed. The removal torque values were registered with a digital screwdriver. After removal, the TADs were collected in a fixed solution and examined using SEM and X-ray microanalysis. RESULTS: All TADs remained intact, with a 100% success rate. There was no difference in removal torque between TiA and SS miniscrews (4.4 ± 1.3 N-cm and 5.1 ± 0.7 N-cm, respectively). All specimens' loss of gloss with signs of biological contaminations resulted in a dull implant surface. SEM photomicrographs of TiA miniscrews showed predominantly blood cells while SS miniscrews showed the precipitation of an amorphous layer with low cellular component. There was no difference in spectroscopic analysis between TiA and SS miniscrews. CONCLUSIONS: TiA and SS miniscrews had comparable removal torque values. SEM photomicrographs showed no evidence of osteointegration with both TADs having similar biological responses.
2018
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Sì, ma tipo non specificato
Settore MED/28 - MALATTIE ODONTOSTOMATOLOGICHE
English
Removal torque; SEM analysis; Stainless steel miniscrew; Titanium alloy miniscrew; Pharmacology (medical)
https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2191-2198.pdf
Bollero, P., Di Fazio, V., Pavoni, C., Cordaro, M., Cozza, P., Lione, R. (2018). Titanium alloy vs. stainless steel miniscrews: An in vivo split-mouth study. EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 22(8), 2191-2198 [10.26355/eurrev-201804-14803].
Bollero, P; Di Fazio, V; Pavoni, C; Cordaro, M; Cozza, P; Lione, R
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2191-2198.pdf

accesso aperto

Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 3 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/208971
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 5
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 11
social impact