ABSTRACT Aims: The aim of the study was to compare the effi- cacy of 37% phosphoric acid, 12% nitric acid, 17% EDTA in endodontic smear layer removal and degree of erosion in the apical third of endodontic canals. Methods and Material: One hundred and four ex- tracted single-rooted human teeth were randomized into four groups (n = 26) and instrumented using ProTaper Universal Ni-Ti rotary instruments. Each canal was irrigated with one of the following solutions: 37% phosphoric acid, 12% nitric acid, 17% EDTA, 5.25% NaOCl (control). All specimens were then irrigated with 5 mL distilled water and dried with sterile paper points. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whit- neyU statistical tests were used. Results: Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) evaluation showed no sig- nificant differences among test reagents in smear layer removal. However, the efficacy of 12% nitric acid and 17% EDTA in removing the smear layer was significantly greater than 5.25% NaOCl (control). De- gree of erosion could not be evaluated. Conclusion: Protocols used in this study were not sufficient to completely remove the smear layer in the apical third of shaped root canals.
Mancini, M., Cianconi, L. (2013). SEM rvaluation of apical itraradicular dentine cleanliness and degree of erosion after apllication of three irrigating solutions. OPEN JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY, 3(1), 171-175.
SEM rvaluation of apical itraradicular dentine cleanliness and degree of erosion after apllication of three irrigating solutions.
CIANCONI, LUIGI
2013-01-01
Abstract
ABSTRACT Aims: The aim of the study was to compare the effi- cacy of 37% phosphoric acid, 12% nitric acid, 17% EDTA in endodontic smear layer removal and degree of erosion in the apical third of endodontic canals. Methods and Material: One hundred and four ex- tracted single-rooted human teeth were randomized into four groups (n = 26) and instrumented using ProTaper Universal Ni-Ti rotary instruments. Each canal was irrigated with one of the following solutions: 37% phosphoric acid, 12% nitric acid, 17% EDTA, 5.25% NaOCl (control). All specimens were then irrigated with 5 mL distilled water and dried with sterile paper points. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whit- neyU statistical tests were used. Results: Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) evaluation showed no sig- nificant differences among test reagents in smear layer removal. However, the efficacy of 12% nitric acid and 17% EDTA in removing the smear layer was significantly greater than 5.25% NaOCl (control). De- gree of erosion could not be evaluated. Conclusion: Protocols used in this study were not sufficient to completely remove the smear layer in the apical third of shaped root canals.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
OJST_2013052814334936.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Articolo Fulltext
Dimensione
552.34 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
552.34 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


