We consider multiple-principal multiple-agent games of incomplete information. We identify a class of two-way communication mechanisms which mirror those considered in the single principal analysis of Myerson (1982). In such mechanisms, every agent truthfully reveals her type to all principals, and obeys the private recommendations she receives from each of them. We show that there is a rationale in restricting attention to this class of mechanisms: if principals use these mechanisms, there is no unilateral incentive to deviate towards more sophisticated ones. We develop three examples to analyze possible extensions and limits of our approach. The first two examples show that the restriction to direct and incentive compatible mechanisms is not sufficient to provide a complete characterization of all pure strategy equilibria. The third one shows that private recommendations play a fundamental role in competing mechanism games, suggesting that one cannot safely restrict to one-sided communication mechanisms.

Attar, A.k., Campioni, E., Piaser, G. (2013). Two-sided communication in competing mechanism games. JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL ECONOMICS, 49(1), 62-70 [10.1016/j.jmateco.2012.09.009].

Two-sided communication in competing mechanism games

ATTAR, ANDREA KAMAL;CAMPIONI, ELOISA;
2013-01-01

Abstract

We consider multiple-principal multiple-agent games of incomplete information. We identify a class of two-way communication mechanisms which mirror those considered in the single principal analysis of Myerson (1982). In such mechanisms, every agent truthfully reveals her type to all principals, and obeys the private recommendations she receives from each of them. We show that there is a rationale in restricting attention to this class of mechanisms: if principals use these mechanisms, there is no unilateral incentive to deviate towards more sophisticated ones. We develop three examples to analyze possible extensions and limits of our approach. The first two examples show that the restriction to direct and incentive compatible mechanisms is not sufficient to provide a complete characterization of all pure strategy equilibria. The third one shows that private recommendations play a fundamental role in competing mechanism games, suggesting that one cannot safely restrict to one-sided communication mechanisms.
2013
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore SECS-P/01 - ECONOMIA POLITICA
English
Incomplete information, competing mechanisms, information revelation
Attar, A.k., Campioni, E., Piaser, G. (2013). Two-sided communication in competing mechanism games. JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL ECONOMICS, 49(1), 62-70 [10.1016/j.jmateco.2012.09.009].
Attar, Ak; Campioni, E; Piaser, G
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
JMATH.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 246.44 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
246.44 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/96392
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact