Abstract OBJECTIVES: To assess the association between clinical and socio-demographic features and anti-Parkinson drug (APD) treatment modifications in patients with PD and to describe neurologist and patient opinions regarding the need for changes in APD therapy. METHODS: Subjects with PD with stable APD treatment over ≥3 months prior to baseline were enrolled and evaluated for socio-demographic data, disability, disease severity and neurologist and patient views on the need to modify APD treatment. RESULTS: 775 Patients were included, 51% with Hoehn and Yahr (HY) stage 1-2 (early PD) and 49% with HY stage 2.5-4 (advanced PD). Neurologists modified APD treatment in 255 patients, 97 (25%) early PD and 158 (41%; p < 0.0001) advanced PD. APD modification was strongly associated with a low educational level and UPDRS part IV score. The most common reasons behind the APD therapy changes among neurologists were presence/worsening of motor or non-motor symptoms (88% and 37% of subjects respectively). Out of 216 patients, 92% and 51% were willing to undergo APD changes to therapy because of the presence/worsening of motor or non-motor symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Neurologist decision to change APD therapy and patients reasons for dissatisfaction with it can be prevalently attributed to the presence/worsening of motor symptoms and motor fluctuations in the advanced stages. Non-motor symptoms were considered more often by patients. The patient educational level played a key role in treatment decision.

Tinazzi, M., Abbruzzese, G., Antonini, A., Ceravolo, R., Fabbrini, G., Lessi, P., et al. (2013). Reasons driving treatment modification in Parkinson's disease: results from the cross-sectional phase of the REASON study. PARKINSONISM & RELATED DISORDERS [10.1016/j.parkreldis.2013.08.006.].

Reasons driving treatment modification in Parkinson's disease: results from the cross-sectional phase of the REASON study.

STEFANI, ALESSANDRO;PIERANTOZZI, MARIANGELA;
2013-12-01

Abstract

Abstract OBJECTIVES: To assess the association between clinical and socio-demographic features and anti-Parkinson drug (APD) treatment modifications in patients with PD and to describe neurologist and patient opinions regarding the need for changes in APD therapy. METHODS: Subjects with PD with stable APD treatment over ≥3 months prior to baseline were enrolled and evaluated for socio-demographic data, disability, disease severity and neurologist and patient views on the need to modify APD treatment. RESULTS: 775 Patients were included, 51% with Hoehn and Yahr (HY) stage 1-2 (early PD) and 49% with HY stage 2.5-4 (advanced PD). Neurologists modified APD treatment in 255 patients, 97 (25%) early PD and 158 (41%; p < 0.0001) advanced PD. APD modification was strongly associated with a low educational level and UPDRS part IV score. The most common reasons behind the APD therapy changes among neurologists were presence/worsening of motor or non-motor symptoms (88% and 37% of subjects respectively). Out of 216 patients, 92% and 51% were willing to undergo APD changes to therapy because of the presence/worsening of motor or non-motor symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Neurologist decision to change APD therapy and patients reasons for dissatisfaction with it can be prevalently attributed to the presence/worsening of motor symptoms and motor fluctuations in the advanced stages. Non-motor symptoms were considered more often by patients. The patient educational level played a key role in treatment decision.
dic-2013
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore MED/26 - NEUROLOGIA
English
Con Impact Factor ISI
Tinazzi, M., Abbruzzese, G., Antonini, A., Ceravolo, R., Fabbrini, G., Lessi, P., et al. (2013). Reasons driving treatment modification in Parkinson's disease: results from the cross-sectional phase of the REASON study. PARKINSONISM & RELATED DISORDERS [10.1016/j.parkreldis.2013.08.006.].
Tinazzi, M; Abbruzzese, G; Antonini, A; Ceravolo, R; Fabbrini, G; Lessi, P; Barone, P; REASON Study Group:Abruzzese, G; Antonini, A; Lido, V; Barone, P; Ceravolo, R; Fabbrini, G; Tinazzi, M; Melone, M; Schettino, C; Califano, F; Ceravolo, M; Capecci, M; Andrenelli, E; Iemolo, F; Spadaro, D; Carnemolla, A; Pontieri, F; Pellicano, C; Benincasa, D; Fabbrini, G; Pietracupa, S; Latorre, A; Tedeschi, G; Tessitore, A; Giordano, A; Bonuccelli, U; Frosini, D; Vanelli, F; Comi, G; Volonté, M; Spagnolo, F; Scaglioni, A; Abrignani, G; Abbruzzese, G; Avanzino, L; Tamburini, T; Antonini, A; Facchini, S; Biundo, R; Altavista, M; Roberti, C; Asteggiano, G; L'Episcopo, M; Saracco, E; Avarello, T; Bono, G; Riboldazzi, G; Leva, S; Del, S; M, C; E, ; Traverso, E; Michelucci, R; Nassetti, S; Pasini, E; Padovani, A; Cottini, E; Bigni, B; Ruggieri, S; Modugno, N; Fischetti, M; Stefani, A; Pierantozzi, M; Bassi, M; Tinazzi, M; Ottaviani, S; Ajena, D; Trianni, G; My, F; Caggiula, M; Valenti, G; Grioli, S; La Farina, I; Zambito Marsala, S; Marchini, C; Gioulis, M; Barone, P; Picillo, M; Moccia, M; Denaro, A; Sebastianelli, L; Onofrj, M; Thomas, A; Marini, C; De Santis, F; Spagnoli, V; L'Erario, R; Passadore, P; Belgrado, E; Mucchiut, M; Priori, A; Cogiamanian, F; Marchet, A
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
reason 2013.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Licenza: Non specificato
Dimensione 255.11 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
255.11 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/95404
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 15
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 14
social impact