Objectives: To determine whether body fat distribution, measured by waist circumference (WC) and waist/hip ratio (WHR), is a better predictor of mortality and morbidity after colorectal surgery than body mass index (BMI) or body surface area (BSA). Background: Obesity measured by BMI is not a consistent risk factor for postoperative mortality and morbidity after abdominal surgery. Studies in metabolic and cardiovascular diseases have shown WC and WHR to be better outcome predictors than BMI. Methods: A prospective multicenter international study was conducted among patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. The WHR, BMI, and BSA were derived from body weight, height, and waist and hip circumferences measured preoperatively. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for postoperative outcomes. Results: A total of 1349 patients (754 men) from 38 centers in 11 countries were included. Increasing WHR significantly increased the risk of conversion [odds ratio (OR) = 15.7, relative risk (RR) = 4.1], intraoperative complications (OR = 11.0, RR = 3.2), postoperative surgical complications (OR = 7.7, RR = 2.0), medical complications (OR = 13.2, RR = 2.5), anastomotic leak (OR = 13.7, RR = 3.3), reoperations (OR = 13.3, RR = 2.9), and death (OR = 653.1, RR = 21.8). Both BMI (OR = 39.5, RR = 1.1) and BSA (OR = 4.9, RR = 3.1) were associated with an increased risk of abdominal wound complication. In multivariate analysis, the WHR predicted intraoperative complications, conversion, medical complications, and reinterventions, whereas BMI was a risk factor only for abdominal wall complications; BSA did not reach significance for any outcome. Conclusions: The WHR is predictive of adverse events after elective colorectal surgery. It should be used in routine clinical practice and in future risk-estimating systems. Keywords: body mass index, body surface area, colorectal surgery, morbimortality, waist/hip ratio

Kartheuser, A., Leonard, D., Penninckx, F., Paterson, H., Brandt, D., Remue, C., et al. (2013). Waist circumference and waist/hip ratio are better predictive risk factors for mortality and morbidity after colorectal surgery than body mass index and body surface area. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 258(5), 722-730 [10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a6605a].

Waist circumference and waist/hip ratio are better predictive risk factors for mortality and morbidity after colorectal surgery than body mass index and body surface area

RULLI, FRANCESCO;
2013-11-01

Abstract

Objectives: To determine whether body fat distribution, measured by waist circumference (WC) and waist/hip ratio (WHR), is a better predictor of mortality and morbidity after colorectal surgery than body mass index (BMI) or body surface area (BSA). Background: Obesity measured by BMI is not a consistent risk factor for postoperative mortality and morbidity after abdominal surgery. Studies in metabolic and cardiovascular diseases have shown WC and WHR to be better outcome predictors than BMI. Methods: A prospective multicenter international study was conducted among patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. The WHR, BMI, and BSA were derived from body weight, height, and waist and hip circumferences measured preoperatively. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for postoperative outcomes. Results: A total of 1349 patients (754 men) from 38 centers in 11 countries were included. Increasing WHR significantly increased the risk of conversion [odds ratio (OR) = 15.7, relative risk (RR) = 4.1], intraoperative complications (OR = 11.0, RR = 3.2), postoperative surgical complications (OR = 7.7, RR = 2.0), medical complications (OR = 13.2, RR = 2.5), anastomotic leak (OR = 13.7, RR = 3.3), reoperations (OR = 13.3, RR = 2.9), and death (OR = 653.1, RR = 21.8). Both BMI (OR = 39.5, RR = 1.1) and BSA (OR = 4.9, RR = 3.1) were associated with an increased risk of abdominal wound complication. In multivariate analysis, the WHR predicted intraoperative complications, conversion, medical complications, and reinterventions, whereas BMI was a risk factor only for abdominal wall complications; BSA did not reach significance for any outcome. Conclusions: The WHR is predictive of adverse events after elective colorectal surgery. It should be used in routine clinical practice and in future risk-estimating systems. Keywords: body mass index, body surface area, colorectal surgery, morbimortality, waist/hip ratio
nov-2013
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Sì, ma tipo non specificato
Settore MED/18 - CHIRURGIA GENERALE
English
humans; body surface area; aged; predictive value of tests; body mass index; colorectal surgery; intraoperative complications; morbidity; prospective studies; postoperative complications; waist-hip ratio; risk factors; hospital mortality; middle aged; waist circumference; female; male
Kartheuser, A., Leonard, D., Penninckx, F., Paterson, H., Brandt, D., Remue, C., et al. (2013). Waist circumference and waist/hip ratio are better predictive risk factors for mortality and morbidity after colorectal surgery than body mass index and body surface area. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 258(5), 722-730 [10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a6605a].
Kartheuser, A; Leonard, D; Penninckx, F; Paterson, H; Brandt, D; Remue, C; Bugli, C; Dozois, E; Mortensen, N; Ris, F; Tiret, E; Abbes Orabi, N; Achkas...espandi
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
PA-Article-publié-Annals-of-Surgery-Novembre-2013.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Dimensione 169.96 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
169.96 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/91818
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 16
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact