This article presents estimates of industrial production in post-Unification Italy's 69 provinces in the census years 1871, 1881, 1901, and 1911. Initially industry was largely artisanal, and located in the former political capitals; but even then the waterfalls of the subalpine north-west attracted what factory industry there was. Contrary to widespread opinion, in the aftermath of Unification the industrial and overall growth leaders were actually in the south, where selected provinces reaped the gains from the freer foreign trade, and infrastructure investment, that accompanied the loss of independence. Over the later nineteenth century industry concentrated into the ‘industrial triangle’; but even there industrialization remained sharply local, and excluded the right bank of the upper Po. The early twentieth century, in turn, brought a measure of industrial diffusion—to the centre/north-east, where it was tied to the production of perishables on recently improved land—and concentration within the north-western triangle itself, into its major cities, as progress in energy transmission effectively moved the waterfalls into the plains.

Ciccarelli, C., Fenoaltea, S. (2013). Through the magnifying glass: provincial aspects of industrial growth in post-Unification Italy. ECONOMIC HISTORY REVIEW, 66(1), 57-85 [10.1111/j.1468-0289.2011.00643.x].

Through the magnifying glass: provincial aspects of industrial growth in post-Unification Italy

CICCARELLI, CARLO;FENOALTEA, STEFANO
2013-01-01

Abstract

This article presents estimates of industrial production in post-Unification Italy's 69 provinces in the census years 1871, 1881, 1901, and 1911. Initially industry was largely artisanal, and located in the former political capitals; but even then the waterfalls of the subalpine north-west attracted what factory industry there was. Contrary to widespread opinion, in the aftermath of Unification the industrial and overall growth leaders were actually in the south, where selected provinces reaped the gains from the freer foreign trade, and infrastructure investment, that accompanied the loss of independence. Over the later nineteenth century industry concentrated into the ‘industrial triangle’; but even there industrialization remained sharply local, and excluded the right bank of the upper Po. The early twentieth century, in turn, brought a measure of industrial diffusion—to the centre/north-east, where it was tied to the production of perishables on recently improved land—and concentration within the north-western triangle itself, into its major cities, as progress in energy transmission effectively moved the waterfalls into the plains.
2013
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore SECS-P/06 - ECONOMIA APPLICATA
Settore SECS-P/12 - STORIA ECONOMICA
English
Ciccarelli, C., Fenoaltea, S. (2013). Through the magnifying glass: provincial aspects of industrial growth in post-Unification Italy. ECONOMIC HISTORY REVIEW, 66(1), 57-85 [10.1111/j.1468-0289.2011.00643.x].
Ciccarelli, C; Fenoaltea, S
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
ehr643.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: Ciccarelli Economic History Review 2013
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 864.36 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
864.36 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
ehr643_sm_Appendix.doc

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: Appendice Online Ciccarelli 2013 Economic History Review
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 226 kB
Formato Microsoft Word
226 kB Microsoft Word   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
ehr643_sm_Appendix.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 100.1 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
100.1 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/89088
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 52
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 43
social impact