This paper investigates the main patterns of industrial specialisation in Italian provinces over half a century following the Unification of the country. To this end, we propose a multivariate graphical technique named dynamic specialisation biplot. In 1871, specialisation vocations towards the different manufacturing sectors were limited in size and no clear geographical clustering emerged. A regional specialisation divide resulted instead clearly in 1911. In 1871 as in 1911, the foodstuffs, textile and engineering sectors represented the three pillars delimiting the arena of the specialisation race. Within that arena, the effect of public policies on the temporal evolution of provincial specialisation is considered. The adoption of free trade in the early 1860s affected noticeably the industrial specialisation of a few Neapolitan provinces. The subsequent protectionist measures altered the specialisation trajectories of selected northern provinces, largely attracted by the textile sector during the 1880s, and by the rapidly growing engineering sector in the pre-First World War decade. Within and between regional homogeneity and smooth specialisation, trajectories are instead representative of most of the remaining provinces. Among them, southern provinces exhibit specialisation paths revealing that little more than a composition effect occurred among manufacturing sectors.

Ciccarelli, C., Proietti, T. (2013). Patterns of industrial specialisation in post-Unification Italy. SCANDINAVIAN ECONOMIC HISTORY REVIEW, 61(3), 259-286 [10.1080/03585522.2013.819029].

Patterns of industrial specialisation in post-Unification Italy

CICCARELLI, CARLO;PROIETTI, TOMMASO
2013-01-01

Abstract

This paper investigates the main patterns of industrial specialisation in Italian provinces over half a century following the Unification of the country. To this end, we propose a multivariate graphical technique named dynamic specialisation biplot. In 1871, specialisation vocations towards the different manufacturing sectors were limited in size and no clear geographical clustering emerged. A regional specialisation divide resulted instead clearly in 1911. In 1871 as in 1911, the foodstuffs, textile and engineering sectors represented the three pillars delimiting the arena of the specialisation race. Within that arena, the effect of public policies on the temporal evolution of provincial specialisation is considered. The adoption of free trade in the early 1860s affected noticeably the industrial specialisation of a few Neapolitan provinces. The subsequent protectionist measures altered the specialisation trajectories of selected northern provinces, largely attracted by the textile sector during the 1880s, and by the rapidly growing engineering sector in the pre-First World War decade. Within and between regional homogeneity and smooth specialisation, trajectories are instead representative of most of the remaining provinces. Among them, southern provinces exhibit specialisation paths revealing that little more than a composition effect occurred among manufacturing sectors.
2013
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore SECS-P/06 - ECONOMIA APPLICATA
Settore SECS-P/12 - STORIA ECONOMICA
English
Ciccarelli, C., Proietti, T. (2013). Patterns of industrial specialisation in post-Unification Italy. SCANDINAVIAN ECONOMIC HISTORY REVIEW, 61(3), 259-286 [10.1080/03585522.2013.819029].
Ciccarelli, C; Proietti, T
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
CiccarelliProiettiSEHR2013.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: Ciccarelli SEHR 2013
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 981.43 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
981.43 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/88251
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 10
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact