No 'theory of contract' can be attributed to Labeo, who agreed with the traditional centrality of obligatio: in D. 50, 16, 19 he was only stressing the proper meaning of 'contrahere' in comparison with its wide usage in the praetor's edict.
Fiori, R. (2012). Contrahere in Labeone. In E. Chevreau, D. Kremer, A. Laquerrière-Lacroix (a cura di), Carmina Iuris: Mélanges en l'honneur de Michel Humbert (pp. 311-331). Paris : De Boccard.
Contrahere in Labeone
Fiori, R
2012-01-01
Abstract
No 'theory of contract' can be attributed to Labeo, who agreed with the traditional centrality of obligatio: in D. 50, 16, 19 he was only stressing the proper meaning of 'contrahere' in comparison with its wide usage in the praetor's edict.File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Fiori - Contrahere in Labeone.PDF
accesso aperto
Licenza:
Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione
1.52 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.52 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
