Application of in silico methods involves several steps. Firstly, chemical or structural properties of nanomaterials are represented by mathematical objects called descriptors, many of which can be calculated rather than measured. Examples of descriptors suitable for nanomaterials include particle size, shape and surface area, ionization potentials of metals, heats of formation of metal oxide clusters6, zeta potentials, and physicochemical properties (e.g. lipophilicity, hydrogen bond donor or acceptor strength) of molecules covalently bound to nanoparticles surfaces. Secondly, using additional mathematical techniques, subsets of descriptors are chosen that are most likely to relate to the biological property (e.g. cell apoptosis, metabolism, or signalling pathway modulation) being modelled. Statistical modelling or machine learning methods, often employing neural networks, generate mathematical models linking descriptors to biological activity. Finally, the model’s robustness and ability to predict properties of new materials is assessed by statistical cross-validation techniques, or by predicting properties of materials in a test set not used to develop the model.

Winkler, D., Mombelli, E., Pietroiusti, A., Tran, L., Worth, A., Fadeel, B., et al. (2013). Applying quantitative structure-activity relationships approaches to nanotoxicology: Current status and future potentials. TOXICOLOGY, 313(1), 15-23 [10.1016/j.tox.2012.11.005].

Applying quantitative structure-activity relationships approaches to nanotoxicology: Current status and future potentials

PIETROIUSTI, ANTONIO;
2013-01-01

Abstract

Application of in silico methods involves several steps. Firstly, chemical or structural properties of nanomaterials are represented by mathematical objects called descriptors, many of which can be calculated rather than measured. Examples of descriptors suitable for nanomaterials include particle size, shape and surface area, ionization potentials of metals, heats of formation of metal oxide clusters6, zeta potentials, and physicochemical properties (e.g. lipophilicity, hydrogen bond donor or acceptor strength) of molecules covalently bound to nanoparticles surfaces. Secondly, using additional mathematical techniques, subsets of descriptors are chosen that are most likely to relate to the biological property (e.g. cell apoptosis, metabolism, or signalling pathway modulation) being modelled. Statistical modelling or machine learning methods, often employing neural networks, generate mathematical models linking descriptors to biological activity. Finally, the model’s robustness and ability to predict properties of new materials is assessed by statistical cross-validation techniques, or by predicting properties of materials in a test set not used to develop the model.
2013
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore MED/44 - MEDICINA DEL LAVORO
English
Con Impact Factor ISI
Winkler, D., Mombelli, E., Pietroiusti, A., Tran, L., Worth, A., Fadeel, B., et al. (2013). Applying quantitative structure-activity relationships approaches to nanotoxicology: Current status and future potentials. TOXICOLOGY, 313(1), 15-23 [10.1016/j.tox.2012.11.005].
Winkler, D; Mombelli, E; Pietroiusti, A; Tran, L; Worth, A; Fadeel, B; Maccall, M
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
toxicology2012.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo Principale
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 12.04 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
12.04 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/67551
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 34
  • Scopus 153
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 132
social impact