This article introduce an analysis of the New Public Management (NPM) approach based on an international comparison between United States and Italy. These two countries offer good cases for a comparative investigation as Italy has a legalistic cultural tradition in public administration while the cultural tradition in the United States emphasizes management. The key differences between NPM reforms in Italy and United States are to be found in their historical roots, implementation processes, continuity of reforms, political/administrative dichotomy, and focus on strategic management.
Baber, W.f., Cerruti, C., de Leonardis, F., Jesuit, D. (2011). Principles and Best Practices of Public Administration in Italy and the United States. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 34, 1-3 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2011.541758].
Principles and Best Practices of Public Administration in Italy and the United States
CERRUTI, CORRADO;
2011-01-01
Abstract
This article introduce an analysis of the New Public Management (NPM) approach based on an international comparison between United States and Italy. These two countries offer good cases for a comparative investigation as Italy has a legalistic cultural tradition in public administration while the cultural tradition in the United States emphasizes management. The key differences between NPM reforms in Italy and United States are to be found in their historical roots, implementation processes, continuity of reforms, political/administrative dichotomy, and focus on strategic management.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Baber Cerruti et al - Principles and best practices of public administration.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Licenza:
Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione
175.19 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
175.19 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.