In open scenarios, agents willing to cooperate must impact the communication barrier between them and their unknown partners. If agents are not relying on any agreement about the meaning they ascribe to the symbols used in the conversation, semantic misalignments will arise on the discourse domain as well, thus making the communication impossible. In wide and heterogeneous scenarios offered by the Web (and its newborn semantic incarnation), traditional and meaning-safe method-ologies for communication need to keep abreast of new dynamic communicative interaction modalities. The uncertainties aris-ing from communication between actors which base their behavior on different and heterogeneous knowledge models have to be taken into account, wisely balancing the extent of “reachable knowledge” with the trustworthiness of its information. Main objective of this work is to augment the FIPA Ontology Service Specification with linguistically-aware methodologies for communication, describing a wide-scope framework for multi-agent systems design, semantic integration and coordination.

Pazienza, M.t., Sguera, S., Stellato, A. (2007). Let's talk about our "being": a linguistic-based ontology framework for coordinating agents. APPLIED ONTOLOGY, 2(3-4), 305-332.

Let's talk about our "being": a linguistic-based ontology framework for coordinating agents

PAZIENZA, MARIA TERESA;STELLATO, ARMANDO
2007-08-01

Abstract

In open scenarios, agents willing to cooperate must impact the communication barrier between them and their unknown partners. If agents are not relying on any agreement about the meaning they ascribe to the symbols used in the conversation, semantic misalignments will arise on the discourse domain as well, thus making the communication impossible. In wide and heterogeneous scenarios offered by the Web (and its newborn semantic incarnation), traditional and meaning-safe method-ologies for communication need to keep abreast of new dynamic communicative interaction modalities. The uncertainties aris-ing from communication between actors which base their behavior on different and heterogeneous knowledge models have to be taken into account, wisely balancing the extent of “reachable knowledge” with the trustworthiness of its information. Main objective of this work is to augment the FIPA Ontology Service Specification with linguistically-aware methodologies for communication, describing a wide-scope framework for multi-agent systems design, semantic integration and coordination.
ago-2007
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Sì, ma tipo non specificato
Settore ING-INF/05 - SISTEMI DI ELABORAZIONE DELLE INFORMAZIONI
English
Con Impact Factor ISI
FIPA-compliant multi-agent systems; ontological primitives; semantic integration; linguistic resources
Proposed Linguistic Watermark ontology and Ontological Linguistic Watermark metadata endow agents embracing our described framework, with the necessary “knowledge about themselves” (in particular, pertaining to mere linguistic aspects of their knowledge) which can be exhibited to other agents to better understand the concrete possibilities of establishing a communication, and exploited by supporting agents (directory facilitator, ontology agents and those specialized figures we introduced in our frame-work) to make these possibilities become ground truth
http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1412410
Pazienza, M.t., Sguera, S., Stellato, A. (2007). Let's talk about our "being": a linguistic-based ontology framework for coordinating agents. APPLIED ONTOLOGY, 2(3-4), 305-332.
Pazienza, Mt; Sguera, S; Stellato, A
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2007_AppliedOntology_LinguisticSemanticCoordinationAgents.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo Principale
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 2.64 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.64 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

Questo articolo è pubblicato sotto una Licenza Licenza Creative Commons Creative Commons

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/58415
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 15
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
social impact