A wide range of essential reasoning tasks rely on contradiction identification, a cornerstone of human rationality, communication and debate founded on the inversion of the logical operators "Every" and "Some." A high-density electroencephalographic (EEG) study was performed in 11 normal young adults. The cerebral network involved in the identification of contradiction included the orbito-frontal and anterior-cingulate cortices and the temporo-polar cortices. The event-related dynamic of this network showed an early negative deflection lasting 500 ms after sentence presentation. This was followed by a positive deflection lasting 1.5 s, which was different for the two logical operators. A lesser degree of network activation (either in neuron number or their level of phase locking or both) occurred while processing statements with "Some," suggesting that this was a relatively simpler scenario with one example to be figured out, instead of the many examples or the absence of a counterexample searched for while processing statements with "Every." A self-generated reward system seemed to resonate the recruited circuitry when the contradictory task is successfully completed.

Medaglia, M., Tecchio, F., Seri, S., DI LORENZO, G., Rossini, P., Porcaro, C. (2009). Contradiction in universal and particular reasoning. HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 30(12), 4187-4197 [10.1002/hbm.20838].

Contradiction in universal and particular reasoning

SERI, STEFANO;DI LORENZO, GIORGIO;
2009-12-01

Abstract

A wide range of essential reasoning tasks rely on contradiction identification, a cornerstone of human rationality, communication and debate founded on the inversion of the logical operators "Every" and "Some." A high-density electroencephalographic (EEG) study was performed in 11 normal young adults. The cerebral network involved in the identification of contradiction included the orbito-frontal and anterior-cingulate cortices and the temporo-polar cortices. The event-related dynamic of this network showed an early negative deflection lasting 500 ms after sentence presentation. This was followed by a positive deflection lasting 1.5 s, which was different for the two logical operators. A lesser degree of network activation (either in neuron number or their level of phase locking or both) occurred while processing statements with "Some," suggesting that this was a relatively simpler scenario with one example to be figured out, instead of the many examples or the absence of a counterexample searched for while processing statements with "Every." A self-generated reward system seemed to resonate the recruited circuitry when the contradictory task is successfully completed.
dic-2009
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Sì, ma tipo non specificato
Settore MED/25 - PSICHIATRIA
English
Con Impact Factor ISI
Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted; Humans; Electroencephalography; Algorithms; Brain; Cognition; Intelligence; Brain Mapping; Reward; Adult; Neural Pathways; Female; Male
Medaglia, M., Tecchio, F., Seri, S., DI LORENZO, G., Rossini, P., Porcaro, C. (2009). Contradiction in universal and particular reasoning. HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 30(12), 4187-4197 [10.1002/hbm.20838].
Medaglia, M; Tecchio, F; Seri, S; DI LORENZO, G; Rossini, P; Porcaro, C
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

Questo articolo è pubblicato sotto una Licenza Licenza Creative Commons Creative Commons

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/56916
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 16
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 16
social impact