The term “disease costing” applies to those economic appraisal methodologies that ascertain the cost borne by a community because of a disease. This approach has been used to calculate the social and economic costs, in terms of loss of productivity, caused by a disease that only in the most serious cases results in the death of an individual. The production loss- es, also defined as indirect costs, are not the only social costs caused by diseases. In addition we point also to the negative variations that are reflected onto two fundamental quan- tities: consumption of resources and state of health. In addition to produc- tion losses and consumption of resources, the third group is unques- tionably the most important in the healthcare sector, since it deals direct- ly with variations in the state of health. This group is denoted by the term “human costs”. In the headache field, we are far behind other patholo- gies, where there is a greater knowl- edge of the economic aspects of both the pathology-related costs and the likely benefits resulting from differ- ent therapeutical approaches. Notwithstanding the disease costing problems that are also reflected in the cost-benefit techniques, it is impor- tant for the economic analysis to gain ground since there is a growing need to keep account of the available resources and the results attainable in the healthcare policies, from the cen- tral to the peripheral levels, where the valuation tools prove even more expedient.
Mennini, F.s. (2003). General disease costing principles. THE JOURNAL OF HEADACHE AND PAIN.
General disease costing principles
MENNINI, FRANCESCO SAVERIO
2003-01-01
Abstract
The term “disease costing” applies to those economic appraisal methodologies that ascertain the cost borne by a community because of a disease. This approach has been used to calculate the social and economic costs, in terms of loss of productivity, caused by a disease that only in the most serious cases results in the death of an individual. The production loss- es, also defined as indirect costs, are not the only social costs caused by diseases. In addition we point also to the negative variations that are reflected onto two fundamental quan- tities: consumption of resources and state of health. In addition to produc- tion losses and consumption of resources, the third group is unques- tionably the most important in the healthcare sector, since it deals direct- ly with variations in the state of health. This group is denoted by the term “human costs”. In the headache field, we are far behind other patholo- gies, where there is a greater knowl- edge of the economic aspects of both the pathology-related costs and the likely benefits resulting from differ- ent therapeutical approaches. Notwithstanding the disease costing problems that are also reflected in the cost-benefit techniques, it is impor- tant for the economic analysis to gain ground since there is a growing need to keep account of the available resources and the results attainable in the healthcare policies, from the cen- tral to the peripheral levels, where the valuation tools prove even more expedient.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.