Studies on split-brain, normal and brain-damaged subjects suggest differences in the processing of semantic relationships by the two hemispheres. Various authors have conceived of this distinction in terms of the paradigmatic/syntagmatic dissociation, and the connotative and denotative meanings of words, and as reflecting different types of links between words. Drews has suggested that a left-hemisphere lesion would affect the processing of intraconceptual relationships, while a right-hemisphere lesion would impair the processing of interconceptual relationships. The goal of this study was to test this hypothesis, using a number of intra- and interconceptual semantic relationships. Pairs of common words were submitted to left-hemisphere brain-damaged and right-hemisphere brain-damaged subjects. The task required subjects to indicate whether or not there was any relationship between the words. The results only partially support the hypothesis. The right/left opposition applied to only one of three types of intraconceptual relationships (whole-part relation) and to one of two types of interconceptual relationship (same location relation). This partially unexpected result is discussed in reference to other studies.
Nocentini, U., Goulet, P., Roberts, P., Joanette, Y. (2001). The effects of left- versus right-hemisphere lesions on the sensitivity to intra- and interconceptual semantic relationships. NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 39(5), 443-451.
The effects of left- versus right-hemisphere lesions on the sensitivity to intra- and interconceptual semantic relationships
NOCENTINI, UGO;
2001-01-01
Abstract
Studies on split-brain, normal and brain-damaged subjects suggest differences in the processing of semantic relationships by the two hemispheres. Various authors have conceived of this distinction in terms of the paradigmatic/syntagmatic dissociation, and the connotative and denotative meanings of words, and as reflecting different types of links between words. Drews has suggested that a left-hemisphere lesion would affect the processing of intraconceptual relationships, while a right-hemisphere lesion would impair the processing of interconceptual relationships. The goal of this study was to test this hypothesis, using a number of intra- and interconceptual semantic relationships. Pairs of common words were submitted to left-hemisphere brain-damaged and right-hemisphere brain-damaged subjects. The task required subjects to indicate whether or not there was any relationship between the words. The results only partially support the hypothesis. The right/left opposition applied to only one of three types of intraconceptual relationships (whole-part relation) and to one of two types of interconceptual relationship (same location relation). This partially unexpected result is discussed in reference to other studies.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.