High velocity oxygen-fuel (HVOF)-sprayed wear resistant Co-28%Mo-17%Cr-3%Si and Ni-32%Mo-15%Cr-3%Si coatings, both as-sprayed and after heat treatments at 600 degrees C for 1 h, have been studied. Particularly, their dry sliding wear behaviour has been compared by ball-on-disk tests against different counterbodies (100Cr6 steel and sintered alumina), and differences were discussed based on microstructural characteristics and micromechanical properties (Vickers microindentation and scratch test responses). As-sprayed coatings contain oxide stringers, are mostly amorphous and display rather low Vickers microhardness (about 7.4 GPa for the Co-based and 6.2 GPa for the Ni-based), toughness and elastic modulus. Heat-treated ones display sub-micrometric crystalline intermetallics, improving hardness (9.6 GPa and 7.4 GPa, respectively) and elastic modulus. Scratch tests indicate greater brittleness of the Ni-based alloy (higher tendency to cracking). Due to low hardness and toughness, both as-sprayed coatings undergo wear loss against steel and alumina counterparts. The more plastic Co-based alloy undergoes higher adhesive wear against steel and lower abrasive wear against alumina; the situation is reversed for the Ni-based alloy. After heat treatment, the wear loss against steel is very low for both coatings; abrasive wear still occurs against alumina. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Bolelli, G., Cannillo, V., Lusvarghi, L., Montorsi, M., Mantini, F., Barletta, M. (2007). Microstructural and tribological comparison of HVOF-sprayed and post-treated M-Mo-Cr-Si (M = Co, Ni) alloy coatings. WEAR, 263, 1397-1416 [10.1016/j.wear.2006.12.002].
Microstructural and tribological comparison of HVOF-sprayed and post-treated M-Mo-Cr-Si (M = Co, Ni) alloy coatings
BARLETTA, MASSIMILIANO
2007-01-01
Abstract
High velocity oxygen-fuel (HVOF)-sprayed wear resistant Co-28%Mo-17%Cr-3%Si and Ni-32%Mo-15%Cr-3%Si coatings, both as-sprayed and after heat treatments at 600 degrees C for 1 h, have been studied. Particularly, their dry sliding wear behaviour has been compared by ball-on-disk tests against different counterbodies (100Cr6 steel and sintered alumina), and differences were discussed based on microstructural characteristics and micromechanical properties (Vickers microindentation and scratch test responses). As-sprayed coatings contain oxide stringers, are mostly amorphous and display rather low Vickers microhardness (about 7.4 GPa for the Co-based and 6.2 GPa for the Ni-based), toughness and elastic modulus. Heat-treated ones display sub-micrometric crystalline intermetallics, improving hardness (9.6 GPa and 7.4 GPa, respectively) and elastic modulus. Scratch tests indicate greater brittleness of the Ni-based alloy (higher tendency to cracking). Due to low hardness and toughness, both as-sprayed coatings undergo wear loss against steel and alumina counterparts. The more plastic Co-based alloy undergoes higher adhesive wear against steel and lower abrasive wear against alumina; the situation is reversed for the Ni-based alloy. After heat treatment, the wear loss against steel is very low for both coatings; abrasive wear still occurs against alumina. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Microstructural and tribological comparison of HVOF-sprayed and post-treated M–Mo–Cr–Si (M = Co, Ni) alloy coatings.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Pdf dell'articolo
Dimensione
6.68 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
6.68 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.