OBJECTIVE—The effect of glycemic variability (GV) on cardiovascular risk has not been fully clarified in type 2 diabetes. We evaluated the effect of GV, blood pressure (BP), and oxidative stress on intima-media thickness (IMT), left ventricular mass index (LVMI), flow-mediated dilation (FMD), and sympathovagal balance (low frequency [LF]/high frequency [HF] ratio) in 26 type 2 diabetic patients (diabetes duration 4.41 6 4.81 years; HbA1c 6.70 6 1.25%) receiving diet and/or metformin treatment, with no hypotensive treatment or complications. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data were used to calculate mean amplitude of glycemic excursion (MAGE), continuous overall net glycemic action (CONGA)-2, mean blood glucose (MBG), mean postprandial glucose excursion (MPPGE), and incremental area under the curve (IAUC). Blood pressure (BP), circadian rhythm, and urinary 15-F2t-isoprostane (8-iso-prostaglandin F2a [PGF2a]) were also evaluated. Subjects were divided into dipper (D) and nondipper (ND) groups according to DBP. RESULTS—IMT and LVMIwere increased inNDversusD(0.7760.08 vs. 0.6860.13 [P=0.04] and 67 6 14 vs. 55 6 11 [P = 0.03], respectively). MBG, MAGE, and IAUC were significantly associated with LF/HF ratio at night (r = 0.50, P = 0.01; r = 0.40, P = 0.04; r = 0.41, P = 0.04, respectively), MPPGE was negatively associated with FMD (r =20.45, P = 0.02), andCONGA-2was positively associatedwith LVMI (r=0.55, P=0.006).TheDsystolic BP was negatively associated with IMT (r =20.43, P = 0.03) andwith LVMI (r =20.52, P = 0.01). Urinary 8-iso-PGF2a was positively associated with LVMI (r = 0.68 P , 0.001). CONCLUSIONS—An impaired GV and BP variability is associated with endothelial and cardiovascular damage in short-term diabetic patients with optimal metabolic control. Oxidative stress is the only independent predictor of increased LV mass and correlates with glucose and BP variability.

Di Flaviani, A., Picconi, F., Di Stefano, P., Giordani, I., Malandrucco, I., Maggio, P., et al. (2011). Impact of glycemic and blood pressure variability on surrogate measures of cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetic patients. DIABETES CARE, 34(7), 1605-1609 [10.2337/dc11-0034].

Impact of glycemic and blood pressure variability on surrogate measures of cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetic patients

Picconi, F;Frajese, G;Frontoni, S
2011-07-01

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—The effect of glycemic variability (GV) on cardiovascular risk has not been fully clarified in type 2 diabetes. We evaluated the effect of GV, blood pressure (BP), and oxidative stress on intima-media thickness (IMT), left ventricular mass index (LVMI), flow-mediated dilation (FMD), and sympathovagal balance (low frequency [LF]/high frequency [HF] ratio) in 26 type 2 diabetic patients (diabetes duration 4.41 6 4.81 years; HbA1c 6.70 6 1.25%) receiving diet and/or metformin treatment, with no hypotensive treatment or complications. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data were used to calculate mean amplitude of glycemic excursion (MAGE), continuous overall net glycemic action (CONGA)-2, mean blood glucose (MBG), mean postprandial glucose excursion (MPPGE), and incremental area under the curve (IAUC). Blood pressure (BP), circadian rhythm, and urinary 15-F2t-isoprostane (8-iso-prostaglandin F2a [PGF2a]) were also evaluated. Subjects were divided into dipper (D) and nondipper (ND) groups according to DBP. RESULTS—IMT and LVMIwere increased inNDversusD(0.7760.08 vs. 0.6860.13 [P=0.04] and 67 6 14 vs. 55 6 11 [P = 0.03], respectively). MBG, MAGE, and IAUC were significantly associated with LF/HF ratio at night (r = 0.50, P = 0.01; r = 0.40, P = 0.04; r = 0.41, P = 0.04, respectively), MPPGE was negatively associated with FMD (r =20.45, P = 0.02), andCONGA-2was positively associatedwith LVMI (r=0.55, P=0.006).TheDsystolic BP was negatively associated with IMT (r =20.43, P = 0.03) andwith LVMI (r =20.52, P = 0.01). Urinary 8-iso-PGF2a was positively associated with LVMI (r = 0.68 P , 0.001). CONCLUSIONS—An impaired GV and BP variability is associated with endothelial and cardiovascular damage in short-term diabetic patients with optimal metabolic control. Oxidative stress is the only independent predictor of increased LV mass and correlates with glucose and BP variability.
lug-2011
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore MED/13 - ENDOCRINOLOGIA
English
Con Impact Factor ISI
Glycemic variability, blood pressure, oxidative stress
Di Flaviani, A., Picconi, F., Di Stefano, P., Giordani, I., Malandrucco, I., Maggio, P., et al. (2011). Impact of glycemic and blood pressure variability on surrogate measures of cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetic patients. DIABETES CARE, 34(7), 1605-1609 [10.2337/dc11-0034].
Di Flaviani, A; Picconi, F; Di Stefano, P; Giordani, I; Malandrucco, I; Maggio, P; Palazzo, P; Sgreccia, F; Peraldo, C; Farina, F; Frajese, G; Fronton...espandi
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
DIFlaviani__Diab_Care2012.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 97.31 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
97.31 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/50479
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 139
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 129
social impact