The primary goal of this study was to explore the social buffering effect that humans offer to goats and dogs with limited exposure to human socialization, particularly in situations involving interactions with unfamiliar humans. A total of 13 dogs and 14 goats were selected for the study, all of which had limited prior socialization with humans. Each animal was placed in a testing room with unfamiliar humans for 15 min. Three experimenters aimed to establish a comfortable environment, encouraging social interaction by offering food to the animals and assessing the animals’ willingness to accept food and their response to being approached and petted. If both conditions were satisfied, the animals were classified as “social”. If one or none of the conditions were met, the animals were classified as “not social”. Cortisol levels were measured by collecting blood samples before and after the test. Non-parametric tests together with a GzLM showed that the effect of human social buffering in goats was different in comparison to dogs: goats exhibited higher cortisol levels after the test, while dogs did not show a significant change. Further analysis demonstrated that “social” goats had a lower likelihood of experiencing significant changes in cortisol levels than dogs. Thus, once human interactions are accepted, both species could benefit from social buffering. In summary, this study enhances our understanding of how dogs and goats respond to social interactions with humans in the social buffering effect.

Scandurra, A., D'Aniello, B., Pero, M.e., Pinelli, C., Di Lucrezia, A., Tudisco, R., et al. (2024). Human social buffer in goats and dogs. ANIMAL COGNITION, 27(1) [10.1007/s10071-024-01861-x].

Human social buffer in goats and dogs

Iommelli, P;
2024-01-01

Abstract

The primary goal of this study was to explore the social buffering effect that humans offer to goats and dogs with limited exposure to human socialization, particularly in situations involving interactions with unfamiliar humans. A total of 13 dogs and 14 goats were selected for the study, all of which had limited prior socialization with humans. Each animal was placed in a testing room with unfamiliar humans for 15 min. Three experimenters aimed to establish a comfortable environment, encouraging social interaction by offering food to the animals and assessing the animals’ willingness to accept food and their response to being approached and petted. If both conditions were satisfied, the animals were classified as “social”. If one or none of the conditions were met, the animals were classified as “not social”. Cortisol levels were measured by collecting blood samples before and after the test. Non-parametric tests together with a GzLM showed that the effect of human social buffering in goats was different in comparison to dogs: goats exhibited higher cortisol levels after the test, while dogs did not show a significant change. Further analysis demonstrated that “social” goats had a lower likelihood of experiencing significant changes in cortisol levels than dogs. Thus, once human interactions are accepted, both species could benefit from social buffering. In summary, this study enhances our understanding of how dogs and goats respond to social interactions with humans in the social buffering effect.
2024
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore BIOS-03/A - Zoologia
English
Cortisol
Dog (Canis lupus familiaris)
Domestication
Goat (Capra hircus)
Stress
Scandurra, A., D'Aniello, B., Pero, M.e., Pinelli, C., Di Lucrezia, A., Tudisco, R., et al. (2024). Human social buffer in goats and dogs. ANIMAL COGNITION, 27(1) [10.1007/s10071-024-01861-x].
Scandurra, A; D'Aniello, B; Pero, Me; Pinelli, C; Di Lucrezia, A; Tudisco, R; Iommelli, P; Mastellone, V; Lombardi, P
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
unpaywall-bitstream--372916368.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 853.61 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
853.61 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/475245
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 13
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 13
social impact