Background: The International Headache Society has proposed new treatment goals for migraine prevention in real world, as a way to set higher standards of care. This study provides the first assessment of the proportion of individuals achieving them after 6 months of migraine-specific treatment with anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (MAbs). Methods: This was a prospective, real-world, European multicenter study, including adults with migraine treated with anti-CGRP MAbs (EUREkA cohort). We assessed the proportions of individuals in each treatment goal category–migraine freedom (no monthly migraine days [MMD]); optimal control (< 4 MMD), modest control (4–6 MMD); insufficient control (>6 MMD)–after 6 months of treatment. We also assessed the proportion of individuals with ≥50% reduction in MMD in the insufficient control group. Results: Of the 5818 individuals in the EUREkA cohort, 4963 had 6 months data. Of these, 82.3% (4086/4963) were females and the median age was 48.0 [40.0–55.0] years. At baseline, the median monthly headache days [MHD] and MMD were 20.0 [13.3–28.0] and 15.0 [10.0–20.0], respectively. All participants were classified as having insufficient headache control (>6 MMD) at baseline. At month 6, 6.9% (342/4963) had migraine freedom, 22.9% (1137/4963) optimal control, 24.6% (1223/4963) modest control and 45.6% (2261/4963) insufficient control. In the insufficient control group, 27.1% (613/2261) had ≥50% reduction in MMD. Conclusions: High standards of care, defined as optimal disease control or even migraine freedom, are achieved in real-world settings with anti-CGRP MAbs in approximately 30% of individuals with a high migraine burden. These findings highlight the need to expand global access to these treatments. Future studies should explore whether initiating migraine-specific preventive treatments earlier could further reduce residual migraine days in responders, enabling a larger proportion of patients to achieve optimal disease control.

Caronna, E., Mas-de-les-Valls, R., Egeo, G., Vazquez, M.m., Castellanos, C.n., Membrilla, J.a., et al. (2026). Is achieving higher standards in real-world migraine care feasible with anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies preventive therapies?: Insights from the EUREkA cohort. CEPHALALGIA, 46(6) [10.1177/03331024261440370].

Is achieving higher standards in real-world migraine care feasible with anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies preventive therapies?: Insights from the EUREkA cohort

Albanese M.;
2026-01-01

Abstract

Background: The International Headache Society has proposed new treatment goals for migraine prevention in real world, as a way to set higher standards of care. This study provides the first assessment of the proportion of individuals achieving them after 6 months of migraine-specific treatment with anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (MAbs). Methods: This was a prospective, real-world, European multicenter study, including adults with migraine treated with anti-CGRP MAbs (EUREkA cohort). We assessed the proportions of individuals in each treatment goal category–migraine freedom (no monthly migraine days [MMD]); optimal control (< 4 MMD), modest control (4–6 MMD); insufficient control (>6 MMD)–after 6 months of treatment. We also assessed the proportion of individuals with ≥50% reduction in MMD in the insufficient control group. Results: Of the 5818 individuals in the EUREkA cohort, 4963 had 6 months data. Of these, 82.3% (4086/4963) were females and the median age was 48.0 [40.0–55.0] years. At baseline, the median monthly headache days [MHD] and MMD were 20.0 [13.3–28.0] and 15.0 [10.0–20.0], respectively. All participants were classified as having insufficient headache control (>6 MMD) at baseline. At month 6, 6.9% (342/4963) had migraine freedom, 22.9% (1137/4963) optimal control, 24.6% (1223/4963) modest control and 45.6% (2261/4963) insufficient control. In the insufficient control group, 27.1% (613/2261) had ≥50% reduction in MMD. Conclusions: High standards of care, defined as optimal disease control or even migraine freedom, are achieved in real-world settings with anti-CGRP MAbs in approximately 30% of individuals with a high migraine burden. These findings highlight the need to expand global access to these treatments. Future studies should explore whether initiating migraine-specific preventive treatments earlier could further reduce residual migraine days in responders, enabling a larger proportion of patients to achieve optimal disease control.
2026
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore MEDS-12/A - Neurologia
English
CGRP
insufficient control
migraine
monoclonal antibodies
optimal control
standard of care
Caronna, E., Mas-de-les-Valls, R., Egeo, G., Vazquez, M.m., Castellanos, C.n., Membrilla, J.a., et al. (2026). Is achieving higher standards in real-world migraine care feasible with anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies preventive therapies?: Insights from the EUREkA cohort. CEPHALALGIA, 46(6) [10.1177/03331024261440370].
Caronna, E; Mas-de-les-Valls, R; Egeo, G; Vazquez, Mm; Castellanos, Cn; Membrilla, Ja; Vaghi, G; Rodriguez-Montolio, J; Fabra, Nf; Caballero, Fs; Jaim...espandi
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
caronna-et-al-2026-is-achieving-higher-standards-in-real-world-migraine-care-feasible-with-anti-cgrp-monoclonal.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 5.2 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
5.2 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/474384
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact