In an age marked by global crises, a transcultural understanding of the philosophical foun- dations of human thought—especially in epistemology and ethics—has become essential. Contemporary ecological crises unfold on a planetary scale, exceeding both the conceptual limits of nation-states and the historically constituted horizons of dominant Western para- digms. Addressing them requires normative frameworks grounded in global interdepend- ence rather than any single civilizational matrix, emerging through sustained transcultural dialogue that integrates diverse philosophical traditions into a shared ecological perspec- tive. As a major geopolitical actor, China demands serious philosophical engagement in this context. Yet traditional research on Chinese ecological thought has relied on close reading, which limits conceptual analysis. While hermeneutic methods remain indispensable for in- terpreting individual texts, they cannot systematically identify recurring conceptual patterns across extensive corpora spanning diverse discourses and long, diachronically differentiat- ed periods. The result is a fragmentary interpretation focused on isolated authors, concepts, or epochs rather than reconstructed continuities and ruptures. This paper proposes a new model based on human–machine collaboration, employing self-supervised embeddings and large language models to generate empirical insights that complement qualitative analysis. By integrating theoretical and AI-driven approaches, it expands reflective capacities and establishes a framework for evaluating AI-generated philosophical insights, contributing to more robust transcultural ecological frameworks.

Rošker, J.s., Pozzo, R., Robnik Šikonja, M., Van Genabith, J. (2026). Exploring Agency in Chinese Environmental Thought through Human–Machine Co-Creation. ASIAN STUDIES, 14(3), 357-374 [10.4312/as.2026.14.3.357-374].

Exploring Agency in Chinese Environmental Thought through Human–Machine Co-Creation

Pozzo, Riccardo;
2026-09-01

Abstract

In an age marked by global crises, a transcultural understanding of the philosophical foun- dations of human thought—especially in epistemology and ethics—has become essential. Contemporary ecological crises unfold on a planetary scale, exceeding both the conceptual limits of nation-states and the historically constituted horizons of dominant Western para- digms. Addressing them requires normative frameworks grounded in global interdepend- ence rather than any single civilizational matrix, emerging through sustained transcultural dialogue that integrates diverse philosophical traditions into a shared ecological perspec- tive. As a major geopolitical actor, China demands serious philosophical engagement in this context. Yet traditional research on Chinese ecological thought has relied on close reading, which limits conceptual analysis. While hermeneutic methods remain indispensable for in- terpreting individual texts, they cannot systematically identify recurring conceptual patterns across extensive corpora spanning diverse discourses and long, diachronically differentiat- ed periods. The result is a fragmentary interpretation focused on isolated authors, concepts, or epochs rather than reconstructed continuities and ruptures. This paper proposes a new model based on human–machine collaboration, employing self-supervised embeddings and large language models to generate empirical insights that complement qualitative analysis. By integrating theoretical and AI-driven approaches, it expands reflective capacities and establishes a framework for evaluating AI-generated philosophical insights, contributing to more robust transcultural ecological frameworks.
1-set-2026
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore M-FIL/06
Settore PHIL-05/A - Storia della filosofia
English
ecological crisis, transcultural philosophy, Chinese environmental ethics, digital humanities, artificial intelligence, human–machine collaboration, epistemology
Rošker, J.s., Pozzo, R., Robnik Šikonja, M., Van Genabith, J. (2026). Exploring Agency in Chinese Environmental Thought through Human–Machine Co-Creation. ASIAN STUDIES, 14(3), 357-374 [10.4312/as.2026.14.3.357-374].
Rošker, Js; Pozzo, R; Robnik Šikonja, M; Van Genabith, J
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2026--Rošker+et+al.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 623.58 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
623.58 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/473185
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact