Architected cellular materials are increasingly proposed for electric-vehicle (EV) battery systems as lightweight solutions that can combine crashworthiness, intrusion mitigation and, in some cases, thermal functionality. However, the literature remains fragmented across heterogeneous architectures, metrics and test conditions, which often prevents design-oriented comparison and limits transferability to pack-level implementation. This review consolidates the state of the art on cellular structures for EV battery applications, covering foams, honeycombs, lattice/TPMS architectures and auxetic or bio-inspired concepts. A unified, design-oriented comparative framework is introduced to discuss mechanical performance (e.g., specific energy absorption, peak crushing force, deformation control), thermal considerations and manufacturing–scalability constraints under an EV battery-pack perspective. By explicitly linking cellular architecture selection to pack safety and integration requirements, including limited crush space, joining interfaces, enclosure stiffness and emerging “pack-as-a-structure” concepts, this work translates dispersed results into actionable engineering insights. Finally, decision-oriented guidelines and a selection flowchart are proposed to support early-stage architecture choice and highlight the most critical research gaps, particularly in multiphysics validation, standardized benchmarking and production-ready integration.

Ceci, A., Costanza, G., Tata, M.e. (2026). Cellular Structures for Electric Vehicle Battery Systems: A Critical Review and Design Guidelines. MATERIALS, 19(14) [10.3390/ma19142985].

Cellular Structures for Electric Vehicle Battery Systems: A Critical Review and Design Guidelines

Alessandra Ceci
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
Girolamo Costanza
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
Maria Elisa Tata
Membro del Collaboration Group
2026-07-10

Abstract

Architected cellular materials are increasingly proposed for electric-vehicle (EV) battery systems as lightweight solutions that can combine crashworthiness, intrusion mitigation and, in some cases, thermal functionality. However, the literature remains fragmented across heterogeneous architectures, metrics and test conditions, which often prevents design-oriented comparison and limits transferability to pack-level implementation. This review consolidates the state of the art on cellular structures for EV battery applications, covering foams, honeycombs, lattice/TPMS architectures and auxetic or bio-inspired concepts. A unified, design-oriented comparative framework is introduced to discuss mechanical performance (e.g., specific energy absorption, peak crushing force, deformation control), thermal considerations and manufacturing–scalability constraints under an EV battery-pack perspective. By explicitly linking cellular architecture selection to pack safety and integration requirements, including limited crush space, joining interfaces, enclosure stiffness and emerging “pack-as-a-structure” concepts, this work translates dispersed results into actionable engineering insights. Finally, decision-oriented guidelines and a selection flowchart are proposed to support early-stage architecture choice and highlight the most critical research gaps, particularly in multiphysics validation, standardized benchmarking and production-ready integration.
10-lug-2026
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Recensione
Esperti anonimi
Settore IIND-03/C - Metallurgia
English
Con Impact Factor ISI
lattice; honeycomb; foam; energy absorption; electric vehicle; crashworthiness; cellular structures; battery pack protection; auxetic; TPMS
Ceci, A., Costanza, G., Tata, M.e. (2026). Cellular Structures for Electric Vehicle Battery Systems: A Critical Review and Design Guidelines. MATERIALS, 19(14) [10.3390/ma19142985].
Ceci, A; Costanza, G; Tata, Me
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Articolo Materials Review finale pubblicato 10 07 2026.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 2.5 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.5 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/472846
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact