Objectives: The diagnostic accuracy of presepsin (P-SEP) in the newborn is still under evaluation. Methods: In a multicenter study, we studied the accuracy of P-SEP as a diagnostic marker of late-onset sepsis (LOS) in critical newborns with underlying disorders, to define the most accurate cut-off to distinguish infected from uninfected patients. Results: Sixty-nine/351 newborns without infections at admission developed LOS. The median P-SEP value at T0 (admission) was 518.0ng/L (IQR 313.0-789.0), without significant differences related to underlying diseases (p=0.52). In neonates who developed LOS, P-SEP increased at the onset of infection (T1) (median: 816.0 ng/L) and after 24-48h (median: 901.0 ng/L) compared with their value at admission (median: 560.0 ng/L) (p<0.01 and p=0.03, respectively). The area under the ROC curve at T1 was 0.71 (95% CI 0.65-0.78) when all cases of sepsis were included in the analysis and increased to 0.74 (95% CI 0.66-0.81) considering only confirmed sepsis. Approximately two-thirds of patients were correctly classified, setting the cut-off at 713ng/L, with a negative predictive value of 89.0 %. Conclusions: At a cut-off of 713ng/L, P-SEP has good accuracy in diagnosing LOS in critically ill newborns. In uninfected newborns, the median value of P-SEP is not influenced by any underlying pathology.

Auriti, C., De Rose, D.u., Maddaloni, C., Ravà, L., Martini, L., Di Tommaso, E., et al. (2025). The accuracy of presepsin in diagnosing neonatal late-onset sepsis in critically ill neonates: a prospective study. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 63(9), 1876-1887 [10.1515/cclm-2025-0128].

The accuracy of presepsin in diagnosing neonatal late-onset sepsis in critically ill neonates: a prospective study

De Rose DU;Martini L;Porzio O;Iannetta M;
2025-01-01

Abstract

Objectives: The diagnostic accuracy of presepsin (P-SEP) in the newborn is still under evaluation. Methods: In a multicenter study, we studied the accuracy of P-SEP as a diagnostic marker of late-onset sepsis (LOS) in critical newborns with underlying disorders, to define the most accurate cut-off to distinguish infected from uninfected patients. Results: Sixty-nine/351 newborns without infections at admission developed LOS. The median P-SEP value at T0 (admission) was 518.0ng/L (IQR 313.0-789.0), without significant differences related to underlying diseases (p=0.52). In neonates who developed LOS, P-SEP increased at the onset of infection (T1) (median: 816.0 ng/L) and after 24-48h (median: 901.0 ng/L) compared with their value at admission (median: 560.0 ng/L) (p<0.01 and p=0.03, respectively). The area under the ROC curve at T1 was 0.71 (95% CI 0.65-0.78) when all cases of sepsis were included in the analysis and increased to 0.74 (95% CI 0.66-0.81) considering only confirmed sepsis. Approximately two-thirds of patients were correctly classified, setting the cut-off at 713ng/L, with a negative predictive value of 89.0 %. Conclusions: At a cut-off of 713ng/L, P-SEP has good accuracy in diagnosing LOS in critically ill newborns. In uninfected newborns, the median value of P-SEP is not influenced by any underlying pathology.
2025
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore MEDS-10/B - Malattie infettive
English
biomarkers; neonatal sepsis; newborn; presepsin; sCD14-ST
Auriti, C., De Rose, D.u., Maddaloni, C., Ravà, L., Martini, L., Di Tommaso, E., et al. (2025). The accuracy of presepsin in diagnosing neonatal late-onset sepsis in critically ill neonates: a prospective study. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 63(9), 1876-1887 [10.1515/cclm-2025-0128].
Auriti, C; De Rose, Du; Maddaloni, C; Ravà, L; Martini, L; Di Tommaso, E; Bernaschi, P; Paionni, E; Porzio, O; Piersigilli, F; Iannetta, M; Dotta, A;...espandi
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/465139
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact