Anesthesiological practices are complex activities with inherent risks. Hazard assessment techniques based on cause-effect links and linear reasoning do not adequately represent the actual behavior of modern socio-technical systems, which are characterized by tight couplings and interactions among technical, human and organizational aspects. Analysing hazards following a linear perspective may result in a not completely effective management of process safety. This paper discusses the need for a systemic analysis for healthcare practices, applying such perspective to an anesthesiological process. More specifically, it aims to define process hazards, and unsafe control actions for preoperative and intraoperative anesthesiological activities, extending simple cause-effect reasoning through the System Theoretic Accident Model and Processes (STAMP) and its hazard analysis technique, i.e. System Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA). The outcomes of the study based on qualitative research techniques point out the relevance of a systemic approach, with implications for process management. It is argued that the adoption of strict procedures to constraint the variability of everyday work represents a valuable solution only for some specific tasks, while for many others variability has to be accepted as a means to enhance patient safety in a healthy work environment.

Patriarca, R., Di Gravio, G., Costantino, F., Fedele, L., Tronci, M., Bianchi, V., et al. (2019). Systemic safety management in anesthesiological practices. SAFETY SCIENCE, 120, 850-864 [10.1016/j.ssci.2019.08.021].

Systemic safety management in anesthesiological practices

Federico Bilotta
2019-12-01

Abstract

Anesthesiological practices are complex activities with inherent risks. Hazard assessment techniques based on cause-effect links and linear reasoning do not adequately represent the actual behavior of modern socio-technical systems, which are characterized by tight couplings and interactions among technical, human and organizational aspects. Analysing hazards following a linear perspective may result in a not completely effective management of process safety. This paper discusses the need for a systemic analysis for healthcare practices, applying such perspective to an anesthesiological process. More specifically, it aims to define process hazards, and unsafe control actions for preoperative and intraoperative anesthesiological activities, extending simple cause-effect reasoning through the System Theoretic Accident Model and Processes (STAMP) and its hazard analysis technique, i.e. System Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA). The outcomes of the study based on qualitative research techniques point out the relevance of a systemic approach, with implications for process management. It is argued that the adoption of strict procedures to constraint the variability of everyday work represents a valuable solution only for some specific tasks, while for many others variability has to be accepted as a means to enhance patient safety in a healthy work environment.
dic-2019
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore MEDS-23/A - Anestesiologia
English
safety assessment
hazard analysis
systems-based theory
systemic safety
qualitative research
Patriarca, R., Di Gravio, G., Costantino, F., Fedele, L., Tronci, M., Bianchi, V., et al. (2019). Systemic safety management in anesthesiological practices. SAFETY SCIENCE, 120, 850-864 [10.1016/j.ssci.2019.08.021].
Patriarca, R; Di Gravio, G; Costantino, F; Fedele, L; Tronci, M; Bianchi, V; Caroletti, F; Bilotta, F
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Patriarca_systemic-safety_2019 .pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 1.2 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.2 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/462942
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 19
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 18
social impact