In this study, we focus on some of the main hypotheses that object to the synonymic interpretation of quelques and plusieurs, namely: (1) quelques and plusieurs specify different quantities; (2) they denote the same quantity, but differ in that plusieurs is characterized by a positive value (oriented toward valorisation), whereas quelques is characterized by a negative value (oriented toward minimisation); (3) quelques refers to a “collective” plurality, while plusieurs determines a sum of clearly individuated and countable elements. Via a particular form of acceptability test, specifically designed for eliciting epilinguistic and metalinguistic intuitions concerning the semantics of quelques and plusieurs, we intend to: a) empirically assess which of the three hypotheses are confirmed in the implicit and explicit knowledge of a group of native speakers of French and a group of Italian-speaking learners at a B2 proficiency level; b) explore the cognitive processes that guide the two groups in their conscious and unconscious interpretation of the two adjectives. The results show that hypotheses (1) and (3) are scarcely represented in the epilinguistic and metalinguistic judgments of native speakers. Moreover, we observe that the explicit knowledge of the two adjectives relies, in most cases, on different metacognitive processes in the two groups.

De Flaviis, G. (2026). Sur les notions d’identité et de quantité désignées par quelques et plusieurs : une expérience empirique à partir d’un corpus d’intuitions de natifs français et d’apprenants italophones. RIVISTA DI PSICOLINGUISTICA APPLICATA, 26(2026/1), 73-90.

Sur les notions d’identité et de quantité désignées par quelques et plusieurs : une expérience empirique à partir d’un corpus d’intuitions de natifs français et d’apprenants italophones

De Flaviis, Giulia
2026-05-01

Abstract

In this study, we focus on some of the main hypotheses that object to the synonymic interpretation of quelques and plusieurs, namely: (1) quelques and plusieurs specify different quantities; (2) they denote the same quantity, but differ in that plusieurs is characterized by a positive value (oriented toward valorisation), whereas quelques is characterized by a negative value (oriented toward minimisation); (3) quelques refers to a “collective” plurality, while plusieurs determines a sum of clearly individuated and countable elements. Via a particular form of acceptability test, specifically designed for eliciting epilinguistic and metalinguistic intuitions concerning the semantics of quelques and plusieurs, we intend to: a) empirically assess which of the three hypotheses are confirmed in the implicit and explicit knowledge of a group of native speakers of French and a group of Italian-speaking learners at a B2 proficiency level; b) explore the cognitive processes that guide the two groups in their conscious and unconscious interpretation of the two adjectives. The results show that hypotheses (1) and (3) are scarcely represented in the epilinguistic and metalinguistic judgments of native speakers. Moreover, we observe that the explicit knowledge of the two adjectives relies, in most cases, on different metacognitive processes in the two groups.
mag-2026
Pubblicato
Rilevanza nazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore FRAN-01/B - Lingua, traduzione e linguistica francese
French
quelques and plusieurs, semantics, epilinguistic competence, metalinguistic consciousness, qualitative methods, cognitive processes.
De Flaviis, G. (2026). Sur les notions d’identité et de quantité désignées par quelques et plusieurs : une expérience empirique à partir d’un corpus d’intuitions de natifs français et d’apprenants italophones. RIVISTA DI PSICOLINGUISTICA APPLICATA, 26(2026/1), 73-90.
De Flaviis, G
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
De Flaviis_bozza.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Documento in Pre-print
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 998.32 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
998.32 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/462650
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact