: This review highlights the increasing prevalence of fraudulent data and publications in medical research, emphasizing the potential harm to patients and the erosion of trust in the medical community. It discusses the impact of low-quality studies on clinical guidelines and patient safety, emphasizing the need for prompt identification. The review proposes using machine learning and artificial intelligence as potential tools to detect anomalies, plagiarism, and data manipulation, potentially improving the peer review process. Despite the acknowledgment of this problem and the growing number of retractions, the review notes a lack of focus on the clinical implications of forged evidence.
Nato, C.g., Bilotta, F. (2024). Fraud in Medical Publications. ANESTHESIOLOGY CLINICS, 42(4) [10.1016/j.anclin.2024.02.004].
Fraud in Medical Publications
Bilotta, Federico
2024-01-01
Abstract
: This review highlights the increasing prevalence of fraudulent data and publications in medical research, emphasizing the potential harm to patients and the erosion of trust in the medical community. It discusses the impact of low-quality studies on clinical guidelines and patient safety, emphasizing the need for prompt identification. The review proposes using machine learning and artificial intelligence as potential tools to detect anomalies, plagiarism, and data manipulation, potentially improving the peer review process. Despite the acknowledgment of this problem and the growing number of retractions, the review notes a lack of focus on the clinical implications of forged evidence.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2024 FraudPublicationAnesthCl24.pdf
non disponibili
Licenza:
Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione
238.95 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
238.95 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


