ObjectiveIn this survey, we assessed the current clinical management of postoperative delirium (POD) among Chinese anesthesiologists, after publishing the European POD guideline.MethodsWe administered an electronic survey, designed according to the European POD guideline. The survey was completed using mobile devices.ResultsIn total, 1,514 respondents from China participated in the survey. Overall, 74.4% of participants reported that delirium is very important. More than 95% of participants stated that they routinely assessed POD. In total, 61.4% screened for POD using clinical observation and 37.6% used a delirium screening tool. Although the depth of anesthesia (a POD risk factor) was monitored, electroencephalogram monitoring was unavailable to 30.6% of respondents. Regarding treatment, only 24.1% of respondents used a standard algorithm; 58.5% used individualized treatment.ConclusionOur survey showed that there are high awareness levels among Chinese anesthesiologists regarding the importance of POD. However, routine assessment and monitoring of all patients, including perioperative anesthesia depth monitoring, and a treatment algorithm need to be implemented on a larger scale. According to the results, efforts should be made to improve the knowledge of POD among Chinese anesthesiologists.

Delp, S., Mei, W., Spies, C.d., Neuner, B., Aldecoa, C., Bettelli, G., et al. (2020). Clinical practice in the management of postoperative delirium by Chinese anesthesiologists: a cross-sectional survey designed by the European Society of Anaesthesiology. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 48(6), 300060520927207 [10.1177/0300060520927207].

Clinical practice in the management of postoperative delirium by Chinese anesthesiologists: a cross-sectional survey designed by the European Society of Anaesthesiology

Bilotta, Federico;
2020-01-01

Abstract

ObjectiveIn this survey, we assessed the current clinical management of postoperative delirium (POD) among Chinese anesthesiologists, after publishing the European POD guideline.MethodsWe administered an electronic survey, designed according to the European POD guideline. The survey was completed using mobile devices.ResultsIn total, 1,514 respondents from China participated in the survey. Overall, 74.4% of participants reported that delirium is very important. More than 95% of participants stated that they routinely assessed POD. In total, 61.4% screened for POD using clinical observation and 37.6% used a delirium screening tool. Although the depth of anesthesia (a POD risk factor) was monitored, electroencephalogram monitoring was unavailable to 30.6% of respondents. Regarding treatment, only 24.1% of respondents used a standard algorithm; 58.5% used individualized treatment.ConclusionOur survey showed that there are high awareness levels among Chinese anesthesiologists regarding the importance of POD. However, routine assessment and monitoring of all patients, including perioperative anesthesia depth monitoring, and a treatment algorithm need to be implemented on a larger scale. According to the results, efforts should be made to improve the knowledge of POD among Chinese anesthesiologists.
2020
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore MEDS-23/A - Anestesiologia
English
China
Postoperative delirium
anesthesiologists
practice
screening
survey
Delp, S., Mei, W., Spies, C.d., Neuner, B., Aldecoa, C., Bettelli, G., et al. (2020). Clinical practice in the management of postoperative delirium by Chinese anesthesiologists: a cross-sectional survey designed by the European Society of Anaesthesiology. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 48(6), 300060520927207 [10.1177/0300060520927207].
Delp, S; Mei, W; Spies, Cd; Neuner, B; Aldecoa, C; Bettelli, G; Bilotta, F; Sanders, Rd; Kramer, S; Weiss, B
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2020 MgmPODchina-JIntMedRes20.pdf

non disponibili

Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 464.49 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
464.49 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/461649
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
social impact