Background: Resilience engineering is a paradigm for safety management that focuses on coping with complexity to achieve success, even considering several conflicting goals. Modern sociotechnical systems have to be resilient to comply with the variability of everyday activities, the tight-coupled and under- specified nature of work, and the nonlinear interactions among agents. At organizational level, resilience can be described as a combination of four cornerstones: monitoring, responding, learning, and anticipating. Methods: Starting from these four categories, this article aims at defining a semiquantitative analytic framework to measure organizational resilience in complex sociotechnical systems, combining the resilience analysis grid and the analytic hierarchy process. Results: This article presents an approach for defining resilience abilities of an organization, creating a structured domain-dependent framework to define a resilience profile at different levels of abstraction, and identifying weaknesses and strengths of the system and potential actions to increase system’s adaptive capacity. An illustrative example in an anesthesia department clarifies the outcomes of the approach. Conclusion: The outcome of the resilience analysis grid, i.e., a weighed set of probing questions, can be used in different domains, as a support tool in a wider Safety-II oriented managerial action to bring safety management into the core business of the organization.

Patriarca, R., Di Gravio, G., Costantino, F., Falegnami, A., Bilotta, F. (2018). An analytic framework to assess organizational resilience. SAFETY AND HEALTH AT WORK, 9(3), 265-276 [10.1016/j.shaw.2017.10.005].

An analytic framework to assess organizational resilience

Bilotta, Federico
2018-01-01

Abstract

Background: Resilience engineering is a paradigm for safety management that focuses on coping with complexity to achieve success, even considering several conflicting goals. Modern sociotechnical systems have to be resilient to comply with the variability of everyday activities, the tight-coupled and under- specified nature of work, and the nonlinear interactions among agents. At organizational level, resilience can be described as a combination of four cornerstones: monitoring, responding, learning, and anticipating. Methods: Starting from these four categories, this article aims at defining a semiquantitative analytic framework to measure organizational resilience in complex sociotechnical systems, combining the resilience analysis grid and the analytic hierarchy process. Results: This article presents an approach for defining resilience abilities of an organization, creating a structured domain-dependent framework to define a resilience profile at different levels of abstraction, and identifying weaknesses and strengths of the system and potential actions to increase system’s adaptive capacity. An illustrative example in an anesthesia department clarifies the outcomes of the approach. Conclusion: The outcome of the resilience analysis grid, i.e., a weighed set of probing questions, can be used in different domains, as a support tool in a wider Safety-II oriented managerial action to bring safety management into the core business of the organization.
2018
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore MEDS-23/A - Anestesiologia
English
complex system
resilience
resilience engineering
safety management
sociotechnical system
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2093791117301968
Patriarca, R., Di Gravio, G., Costantino, F., Falegnami, A., Bilotta, F. (2018). An analytic framework to assess organizational resilience. SAFETY AND HEALTH AT WORK, 9(3), 265-276 [10.1016/j.shaw.2017.10.005].
Patriarca, R; Di Gravio, G; Costantino, F; Falegnami, A; Bilotta, F
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Patriarca_an-analytic_2018.pdf

non disponibili

Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 1.64 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.64 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/461625
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 18
  • Scopus 123
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 90
social impact