Purpose of reviewThis review reports an update of the evidence on practices applied for the prevention and management of the most common complications after craniotomy surgery.Recent findingsLatest guidelines support the combined thromboprophylaxis with the use of both mechanical and chemical modalities, preferably applied within 24 h after craniotomy. Nevertheless, a heightened risk of minor hemorrhagic events remains an issue of concern. Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and pain constitute the complications most commonly encountered during the first 24 h postcraniotomy. Recently, neurokinin type-1 receptor antagonists have been tested as adjuncts for PONV prophylaxis with encouraging results, whereas dexmedetomidine and gabapentinoids emerge as promising alternatives for postcraniotomy pain management. The available data for seizure prophylaxis following craniotomy lacks scientific quality; thus, this remains still a debatable issue. Significantly, a growing body of evidence supports the superiority of levetiracetam over the older antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), in terms of efficacy and safety.SummaryOptimum management of postoperative complications is incorporated as an integral part of the augmented quality of care in patients undergoing craniotomy surgery, aiming to improve outcomes. This review may serve as a benchmark for neuroanesthetists for heightened clinical awareness and prompt institution of well-documented practices.

Tsaousi, G.g., Pourzitaki, C., Bilotta, F. (2017). Prophylaxis of postoperative complications after craniotomy. CURRENT OPINION IN ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 30(5), 534-539 [10.1097/ACO.0000000000000493].

Prophylaxis of postoperative complications after craniotomy

Bilotta, Federico
2017-01-01

Abstract

Purpose of reviewThis review reports an update of the evidence on practices applied for the prevention and management of the most common complications after craniotomy surgery.Recent findingsLatest guidelines support the combined thromboprophylaxis with the use of both mechanical and chemical modalities, preferably applied within 24 h after craniotomy. Nevertheless, a heightened risk of minor hemorrhagic events remains an issue of concern. Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and pain constitute the complications most commonly encountered during the first 24 h postcraniotomy. Recently, neurokinin type-1 receptor antagonists have been tested as adjuncts for PONV prophylaxis with encouraging results, whereas dexmedetomidine and gabapentinoids emerge as promising alternatives for postcraniotomy pain management. The available data for seizure prophylaxis following craniotomy lacks scientific quality; thus, this remains still a debatable issue. Significantly, a growing body of evidence supports the superiority of levetiracetam over the older antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), in terms of efficacy and safety.SummaryOptimum management of postoperative complications is incorporated as an integral part of the augmented quality of care in patients undergoing craniotomy surgery, aiming to improve outcomes. This review may serve as a benchmark for neuroanesthetists for heightened clinical awareness and prompt institution of well-documented practices.
2017
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore MEDS-23/A - Anestesiologia
English
craniotomy
postoperative complications
postoperative nausea and vomiting
seizures
thromboprophylaxis
Tsaousi, G.g., Pourzitaki, C., Bilotta, F. (2017). Prophylaxis of postoperative complications after craniotomy. CURRENT OPINION IN ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 30(5), 534-539 [10.1097/ACO.0000000000000493].
Tsaousi, Gg; Pourzitaki, C; Bilotta, F
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2017 ProphylPOPcompleCr-COA17.pdf

non disponibili

Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 219.06 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
219.06 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/461620
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 9
social impact