Light-related visual disturbances are common symptoms among patients with dry eye disease (DED) but difficult to be evaluated in the clinical practice. This cross-sectional, multicenter, controlled study aimed at comparing light discomfort thresholds in healthy individuals and patients with DED, and to further correlate thresholds with ocular surface parameters. The Lumiz 100 device (Essilor International, Paris, France) was employed to measure light discomfort thresholds in 25 patients with DED and 25 sex- and age-matched healthy subjects under different lighting conditions: continuous warm, continuous cold and flashing warm. Participants were instructed to press a button twice to signal discomfort levels as “just perceptible” and “really disturbing”. The mean of the two values was calculated for each lighting condition. DED patients exhibited lower discomfort thresholds for all measurements compared to controls (continuous warm: 2.81 ± 0.56 log10[lux] vs. 3.47 ± 0.51 log10[lux], continuous cold: 2.78 ± 0.54 log10[lux] vs. 3.48 ± 0.50 log10[lux], flashing warm: 2.54 ± 0.53 log10[lux] vs. 3.12 ± 0.69 log10[lux], all p ≤ 0.004). A significant negative correlation was found between total light sensitivity threshold and ocular discomfort symptoms in patients with DED (r=-0.499, p = 0.011). Conversely, no significant correlation was found between light thresholds and the other ocular surface parameters. These findings show that DED patients have a higher light sensitivity than healthy subjects.

Lixi, F., Coco, G., Corda, C., Villani, E., Curci, A., Slidsborg, C., et al. (2025). Light discomfort thresholds under different lighting conditions in healthy subjects and dry eye patients. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 15(1) [10.1038/s41598-025-15633-1].

Light discomfort thresholds under different lighting conditions in healthy subjects and dry eye patients

Coco, G;
2025-08-09

Abstract

Light-related visual disturbances are common symptoms among patients with dry eye disease (DED) but difficult to be evaluated in the clinical practice. This cross-sectional, multicenter, controlled study aimed at comparing light discomfort thresholds in healthy individuals and patients with DED, and to further correlate thresholds with ocular surface parameters. The Lumiz 100 device (Essilor International, Paris, France) was employed to measure light discomfort thresholds in 25 patients with DED and 25 sex- and age-matched healthy subjects under different lighting conditions: continuous warm, continuous cold and flashing warm. Participants were instructed to press a button twice to signal discomfort levels as “just perceptible” and “really disturbing”. The mean of the two values was calculated for each lighting condition. DED patients exhibited lower discomfort thresholds for all measurements compared to controls (continuous warm: 2.81 ± 0.56 log10[lux] vs. 3.47 ± 0.51 log10[lux], continuous cold: 2.78 ± 0.54 log10[lux] vs. 3.48 ± 0.50 log10[lux], flashing warm: 2.54 ± 0.53 log10[lux] vs. 3.12 ± 0.69 log10[lux], all p ≤ 0.004). A significant negative correlation was found between total light sensitivity threshold and ocular discomfort symptoms in patients with DED (r=-0.499, p = 0.011). Conversely, no significant correlation was found between light thresholds and the other ocular surface parameters. These findings show that DED patients have a higher light sensitivity than healthy subjects.
9-ago-2025
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore MEDS-17/A - Malattie dell'apparato visivo
English
Dry eye disease
Glare
Light discomfort thresholds
Light sensitivity
Photophobia
Lixi, F., Coco, G., Corda, C., Villani, E., Curci, A., Slidsborg, C., et al. (2025). Light discomfort thresholds under different lighting conditions in healthy subjects and dry eye patients. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 15(1) [10.1038/s41598-025-15633-1].
Lixi, F; Coco, G; Corda, C; Villani, E; Curci, A; Slidsborg, C; Giannaccare, G
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
unpaywall-bitstream-2109607275.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.37 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.37 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/459067
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact