Repeatability of Pentacam HR in Keratoconus According to Two Different Scan Protocols: 25-3D Scan and 50-Cornea Fine

Background: This study aims to evaluate the repeatability of the Pentacam HR, comparing two different measurement modes (50-cornea fine and 25-3D scan) in patients affected by keratoconus. Methods: Multicenter retrospective study, conducted at Eye Clinic of the ASST-Spedali Civili-University of Brescia, Italy, and St. Paul’s Eye Unit, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, United Kingdom. A total of 72 eyes from 72 patients with keratoconus underwent six consecutive measurements, three using the 25-3D scan mode and three with the 50-Cornea fine mode. Measurements were made by one single observer, using the Scheimpflug corneal tomographer camera (Pentacam HR, Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany). Repeatability was assessed using the within-subject SD (Sw) statistic from a two-way analysis of variance. Results: Both measurement modes had excellent repeatability. The interclass coefficient correlation (ICC) was excellent (>0.9) in all the parameters evaluated, apart from anterior and posterior astigmatic axes and posterior astigmatism (ICC > 0.8) and index of height asymmetry (IHA) (ICC < 0.6). However, in 18 of 29 parameters, the ICC was higher in case of 25-3D scan. Repeatability limit for Kmax was 1.00D in 25-3D scan mode and 1.02D in case of 50-cornea fine. Conclusions: 25-3D scan may be preferable to 50-Cornea fine, in view of having slightly higher ICC in case of patients with keratoconus. Repeatability limits reported may be helpful in clinical practice for assessing the progression of keratoconus.