The legal techniques for incorporating global standards for banking and accounting in the EU differ remarkably. The incorporation of standards drafted by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) into EU law often takes the form of a process of adaptation: principles set forth in global standards form the basis of EU rules, which further specify such principles in detailed regulations. For international financial reporting standards (IFRS) set up by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), however, EU institutions have envisaged a systematic use of global standards, setting forth a specific endorsement procedure, through which the Commission decides whether the standards correspond to specific criteria. The analysis in the chapter shows how these two different models of incorporation can lead to very different results, in terms of how far procedural principles are respected and, ultimately, on the consequences of the incorporation of global standards on core EU administrative law principles.
De Bellis, M. (2025). Adaptation and Endorsement: The Incorporation of Global Standards for Banking and Accounting in the EU. In M. Eliantonio, A. Volpato, S. Rottger-Wirtz (a cura di), Global Standards and EU Law (pp. 91-115). Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. [10.4337/9781802202274.00012].
Adaptation and Endorsement: The Incorporation of Global Standards for Banking and Accounting in the EU
De Bellis, M
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
2025-01-01
Abstract
The legal techniques for incorporating global standards for banking and accounting in the EU differ remarkably. The incorporation of standards drafted by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) into EU law often takes the form of a process of adaptation: principles set forth in global standards form the basis of EU rules, which further specify such principles in detailed regulations. For international financial reporting standards (IFRS) set up by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), however, EU institutions have envisaged a systematic use of global standards, setting forth a specific endorsement procedure, through which the Commission decides whether the standards correspond to specific criteria. The analysis in the chapter shows how these two different models of incorporation can lead to very different results, in terms of how far procedural principles are respected and, ultimately, on the consequences of the incorporation of global standards on core EU administrative law principles.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


