TrES-5 b is one of only three ultrahot Jupiters with suggestions of a possibly decreasing orbital period that have persisted through multiple independent analyses. While WASP-12 b’s decreasing period is well explained by tidally induced orbital decay, and stellar acceleration has been proposed for WASP-4 b, the cause of the apparent trend for TrES-5 b has not been satisfactorily explained. This work extends the previous observations with 14 new ground-based transits from 2016 to 2024 and two newly published midtimes for data from 2007 and 2009. Four TESS sectors (75, 77, 82, and 84) have also been included for the first time. With the new data, the case for a decreasing orbital period is much weaker than before. The revised rate of period change, P ̇ = − 5.3 ± 2.2 ms yr−1, is less than half that found in previous work, and the preference for a quadratic over a linear model, as measured through ΔBICLQ, has been falling since 2020, with a current value of 11. Furthermore, these results are not robust to outliers; removing a single early transit midtime causes the effect to vanish (ΔBICLQ = −1). Additionally, no significant periodic signals in the transit timing data are identified. The current data are well explained by a linear ephemeris.
Rothmeier, M., Adams, E.r., Schindler, K., Beck, A., Jackson, B., Morgenthaler, J.p., et al. (2025). Doomed Worlds. II. Reassessing Suggestions of Orbital Decay for TrES-5 b. THE PLANETARY SCIENCE JOURNAL, 6(12) [10.3847/psj/ae1b9c].
Doomed Worlds. II. Reassessing Suggestions of Orbital Decay for TrES-5 b
Luigi Mancini;
2025-01-01
Abstract
TrES-5 b is one of only three ultrahot Jupiters with suggestions of a possibly decreasing orbital period that have persisted through multiple independent analyses. While WASP-12 b’s decreasing period is well explained by tidally induced orbital decay, and stellar acceleration has been proposed for WASP-4 b, the cause of the apparent trend for TrES-5 b has not been satisfactorily explained. This work extends the previous observations with 14 new ground-based transits from 2016 to 2024 and two newly published midtimes for data from 2007 and 2009. Four TESS sectors (75, 77, 82, and 84) have also been included for the first time. With the new data, the case for a decreasing orbital period is much weaker than before. The revised rate of period change, P ̇ = − 5.3 ± 2.2 ms yr−1, is less than half that found in previous work, and the preference for a quadratic over a linear model, as measured through ΔBICLQ, has been falling since 2020, with a current value of 11. Furthermore, these results are not robust to outliers; removing a single early transit midtime causes the effect to vanish (ΔBICLQ = −1). Additionally, no significant periodic signals in the transit timing data are identified. The current data are well explained by a linear ephemeris.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
283-2025-PSJ-6-292.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
2.05 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.05 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


