There is a growing interest in teachers’ responses to bullying and their impact on student behavior and well-being. This study aimed to adapt the Teachers’ Responses to Bullying Questionnaire (TRBQ), originally based on students’ reports, to capture teachers’ perspectives (TRBQ-T), and to test its theoretical structure and measurement invariance across school level and gender in two samples of teachers. Study 1 involved 42,939 Italian teachers (85.1% females; Mage = 50.9; SDage = 8.84) and was used to test the factor structure (i.e., EFA, CFA), internal consistency, convergent validity, discriminant validity, and measurement invariance (both at the school and gender levels). Study 2 included 47,118 Italian teachers (84.9% females; Mage = 50.3; SDage = 9.3) and was used to replicate Study 1, which results the validity and reliability of TRBQ-T in assessing teachers’ responses to bullying across four factors: Disciplinary Methods, Victim Support, Group Discussion, and Mediation. The “Non-intervention” factor was not supported. Full strict invariance was achieved across gender and school level, with partial invariance in covariances and factor means across school level. Findings support the TRBQ-T as a robust instrument for capturing teachers’ self-reported strategies to address bullying.

Muñoz-Fernández, N., Nappa, M.r., Stefanelli, F., Palladino, B.e., Nocentini, A., Menesini, E. (2025). A Validation Study of Teachers’ Responses to Bullying Questionnaire (TRBQ–T) in Two Large Samples of Teachers. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BULLYING PREVENTION [10.1007/s42380-025-00315-3].

A Validation Study of Teachers’ Responses to Bullying Questionnaire (TRBQ–T) in Two Large Samples of Teachers

Nappa, Maria Rosaria;
2025-01-01

Abstract

There is a growing interest in teachers’ responses to bullying and their impact on student behavior and well-being. This study aimed to adapt the Teachers’ Responses to Bullying Questionnaire (TRBQ), originally based on students’ reports, to capture teachers’ perspectives (TRBQ-T), and to test its theoretical structure and measurement invariance across school level and gender in two samples of teachers. Study 1 involved 42,939 Italian teachers (85.1% females; Mage = 50.9; SDage = 8.84) and was used to test the factor structure (i.e., EFA, CFA), internal consistency, convergent validity, discriminant validity, and measurement invariance (both at the school and gender levels). Study 2 included 47,118 Italian teachers (84.9% females; Mage = 50.3; SDage = 9.3) and was used to replicate Study 1, which results the validity and reliability of TRBQ-T in assessing teachers’ responses to bullying across four factors: Disciplinary Methods, Victim Support, Group Discussion, and Mediation. The “Non-intervention” factor was not supported. Full strict invariance was achieved across gender and school level, with partial invariance in covariances and factor means across school level. Findings support the TRBQ-T as a robust instrument for capturing teachers’ self-reported strategies to address bullying.
2025
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore PSIC-02/A - Psicologia dello sviluppo e dell'educazione
English
Bullying
Gender invariance
Replication study
School level invariance
Teachers’ responses
Muñoz-Fernández, N., Nappa, M.r., Stefanelli, F., Palladino, B.e., Nocentini, A., Menesini, E. (2025). A Validation Study of Teachers’ Responses to Bullying Questionnaire (TRBQ–T) in Two Large Samples of Teachers. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BULLYING PREVENTION [10.1007/s42380-025-00315-3].
Muñoz-Fernández, N; Nappa, Mr; Stefanelli, F; Palladino, Be; Nocentini, A; Menesini, E
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Munos.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 646.6 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
646.6 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/437167
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact