Touch, such as affective caress, can be interpreted as being pleasant. The emotional valence that is assigned to touch is related to certain bottom-up factors, such as the optimal activation of C-tactile (CT) afferents. Tactile processing with a hedonic or emotional component has been defined as affective touch—a component that CT fibers are likely to convey. Tactile deficiencies are frequent in the psychiatric population but also in healthy people with disorganized attachment; accordingly, it is likely that affective difficulties in adults with disorganized attachment are reflected in altered perception of affective touch. To test this hypothesis, we combined methods from clinical psychology, psychophysics, and neuroimaging. We found that people with a history of traumatic parental bonds and a disorganized attachment pattern perceive a “caress-like” stimulus as being unpleasant, whereas participants with organized attachment consider the same tactile stimulation to be pleasant. Further, unlike in organized adults, the responses of disorganized adults to CT and non-CT stimulation activated limbic and paralimbic structures in a fight-or-flight manner, suggesting that early experiences with parental deficiencies shape the physiological responses of peripheral CT fibers and central nervous networks.

Spitoni, G.f., Zingaretti, P., Giovanardi, G., Antonucci, G., Galati, G., Lingiardi, V., et al. (2020). Disorganized attachment pattern affects the perception of affective touch. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 10(1) [10.1038/s41598-020-66606-5].

Disorganized attachment pattern affects the perception of affective touch

Galati G;Cruciani G;
2020-01-01

Abstract

Touch, such as affective caress, can be interpreted as being pleasant. The emotional valence that is assigned to touch is related to certain bottom-up factors, such as the optimal activation of C-tactile (CT) afferents. Tactile processing with a hedonic or emotional component has been defined as affective touch—a component that CT fibers are likely to convey. Tactile deficiencies are frequent in the psychiatric population but also in healthy people with disorganized attachment; accordingly, it is likely that affective difficulties in adults with disorganized attachment are reflected in altered perception of affective touch. To test this hypothesis, we combined methods from clinical psychology, psychophysics, and neuroimaging. We found that people with a history of traumatic parental bonds and a disorganized attachment pattern perceive a “caress-like” stimulus as being unpleasant, whereas participants with organized attachment consider the same tactile stimulation to be pleasant. Further, unlike in organized adults, the responses of disorganized adults to CT and non-CT stimulation activated limbic and paralimbic structures in a fight-or-flight manner, suggesting that early experiences with parental deficiencies shape the physiological responses of peripheral CT fibers and central nervous networks.
2020
Pubblicato
Rilevanza internazionale
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Settore PSIC-04/A - Psicologia dinamica
English
disorganized attachment pattern
affective touch
traumatic parental bonds
Spitoni, G.f., Zingaretti, P., Giovanardi, G., Antonucci, G., Galati, G., Lingiardi, V., et al. (2020). Disorganized attachment pattern affects the perception of affective touch. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 10(1) [10.1038/s41598-020-66606-5].
Spitoni, Gf; Zingaretti, P; Giovanardi, G; Antonucci, G; Galati, G; Lingiardi, V; Cruciani, G; Titone, G; Boccia, M
Articolo su rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Spitoni_Affective-touch_2020.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.42 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.42 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2108/420365
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 19
  • Scopus 50
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 47
social impact