The impact of coronary revascularization on long-term outcomes after surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

BACKGROUND: Complications due to undetectable coronary artery disease are the major causes of morbidity and mortality in the surgical treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). The aim of our study was to evaluate the importance of significant coronary artery disease identification and the impact of coronary revascularization on early and late outcomes after surgical repair of AAA. METHODS: Between January 1994 and July 2004, 210 patients (204 males and 6 females, mean age 68 +/- 12 years) were candidates to elective surgical repair of AAA. Coronary angiography was performed in 122 patients (58%) in presence of angina symptoms, previous myocardial infarction, echocardiographic or scinti-scan evidence of myocardial ischemia. Coronary revascularization was performed in 83 patients (39.5%). The population was divided into two groups: coronary artery bypass graft/coronary angioplasty (CABG/PTCA) + AAA group (83 patients submitted to CABG surgery [n = 61], or PTCA [n = 22], for significant coronary artery disease before surgical repair of AAA), AAA group (127 patients without significant coronary artery disease, operated for AAA). Follow-up (90% complete) had a mean duration of 42 +/- 23 months. RESULTS: CABG/PTCA + AAA group compared to AAA group presented major symptoms of angina (p = 0.001), higher incidence of previous myocardial infarction (67 vs 10%, p < 0.0001), lower mean value of left ventricular ejection fraction (50 vs 54%, p = 0.01). Operative mortality was 0.95%, and was not related to any cardiac morbidity: operative mortality was observed in the AAA group (2 patients died of anossic cerebral damage and respiratory failure) and was absent in the CABG/PTCA + AAA group (p = 0.8). The overall 8-year survival in the AAA group and in the CABG/PTCA + AAA group was 80 +/- 11 vs 95 +/- 2.8%, respectively (p = 0.7). Freedom from cardiac late death and freedom from cardiac events (recurrence of angina, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure) were high in both groups (93 +/- 6.4 vs 97 +/- 2.3%, p = 0.6; and 91 +/- 6.6 vs 89 +/- 6.7%, p = 0.5, respectively). In the CABG/PTCA + AAA group symptoms for angina (p = 0.0002) and dyspnea (p < 0.0001) significantly improved during the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Significant coronary artery disease was not negligible (39.5%) in patients candidates to surgical repair of AAA. Identification and correction of coronary artery disease prior to AAA surgery is the most important strategy to reduce the risk of vascular procedure. The beneficial impact of coronary revascularization on early and late outcomes is evident, in terms of satisfactory survival and freedom from cardiac adverse events. Therefore, coronary angiography is strongly suggested to optimize early and long-term results.